GerryRA
10-05-2013, 05:36
Mystery missing finish on DOT 1944
I had an opportunity to examine a DOT 1944 K98 that seems to have an unusually missing metal finish. All numbered parts match and the metal work and the stock and handguard show almost no wear and tear and don’t seem to have led a hard life.
But, almost all of the ‘blue’ is just plain missing. Not worn off, not buffed or chemically treated, just missing, like it flaked or evaporated. Even under the handguard and under the wood line of the stock. The only blue left is a couple inches on the bottom of the barrel where it is covered by the stock tip and bayonet bar, the barrel channel of the tip, a bit on the bottom flat of the receiver, in a thin line stripe just above the wood line, a bit in the finger loop of the trigger guard and in a few seams and markings.
The bolt handle has a little patina from handling as well as the exposed barrel between the bands from grasping at the 'order'. The metal work of this rifle is not 'bright', just naked.
It seems to be a similar situation to the finish falling off of early production gas cylinders of US M1 rifles.
So what gives?
I had an opportunity to examine a DOT 1944 K98 that seems to have an unusually missing metal finish. All numbered parts match and the metal work and the stock and handguard show almost no wear and tear and don’t seem to have led a hard life.
But, almost all of the ‘blue’ is just plain missing. Not worn off, not buffed or chemically treated, just missing, like it flaked or evaporated. Even under the handguard and under the wood line of the stock. The only blue left is a couple inches on the bottom of the barrel where it is covered by the stock tip and bayonet bar, the barrel channel of the tip, a bit on the bottom flat of the receiver, in a thin line stripe just above the wood line, a bit in the finger loop of the trigger guard and in a few seams and markings.
The bolt handle has a little patina from handling as well as the exposed barrel between the bands from grasping at the 'order'. The metal work of this rifle is not 'bright', just naked.
It seems to be a similar situation to the finish falling off of early production gas cylinders of US M1 rifles.
So what gives?