PDA

View Full Version : 100x spotting scope?



broom jockey
01-11-2014, 11:31
Looking for at least a 100x spotting scope so I can see 22 cal. holes at 200 yards or better. But, I don't want to deflate my bank account at the same time. Any suggestions?
Thank you

cwbuff
01-11-2014, 06:04
There is a difference between magnification (e.g. 100x) and resolution (i.e., optical clarity or the sharpness of the image produced by the optics). A scope with high magnification and poor optical clarity will simply magnify a poor image that may still not allow you to see the bullet holes. One can manufacture a cheap scope with high magnification, but building a scope with excellent optical clarity is much more expensive. Swarovski is one of the best, but they sell for over $2000. You can find a vintage Baush & Lomb spotting scope for $200 to $300. They have great glass and come in different magnification levels. I routinely use mine with a 19.5x lens at 100 yards. I will try mine with a 25x and 36x lens and see if it will work at 200 yards.

cwbuff
01-11-2014, 06:55
Another option is the "Lord Bury" telescope by J.H. Steward of London. These sell for around $300. This telescope was designed for checking targets of long range rifle competition shooting. It was "the telescope" in the Creedmoor matches. They have a unique pancratic lens which enables zooming the power from 20X to 40X. Telescope configuration is four draw with sun shade and blacked brass body. I use mine at the range. It fits perfectly into a British Mark V Signal Telescope Stand (WWI trench tripod).

Major Tom
01-13-2014, 01:09
Thank you gentlemen. It's another example of you get what you pay as far as quality.

High Plaines Doug r
01-13-2014, 01:46
Under ideal outdoor conditions, a half-way decent 20x scope will show .22 cal holes in a target at 200yds. A little mirage makes seeing shots in the black difficult while shots outside the bull may still be visible. Heavy mirage makes seeing .22 cal holes impossible even with the magnification you are asking for are because you are only magnifying the boil in the air; i.e. the air between you and your target is too disturbed to see through with the clarity to see .22" detail regardless of magnification or resolution.

Now, if you're shooting indoors at 200yds; a good 100x scope should be like looking at a 60" TV screen. Under those conditions, a 36x scope is more than adequate.

jgaynor
01-13-2014, 01:57
Use a more reasonable power scope (25x to 40X) in conjunction with flourescent green disclosing targets.

Herschel
01-13-2014, 03:41
The older B & L Sr 60 spotting scopes come up from time to time on ebay. They could be had with 15X, 20X, 30X and 60X ocular lenses. With 60X focusing was critical but they produced a very clear image. I can't imagine needing 100X.

joem
01-14-2014, 06:26
A fellow at the club used to use a reflecting telescope. I think it was about a 6" and he had the lens to make the image appear right side up. You could see the grain of the paper with it or a fly landing on the paper.

sac troop
01-14-2014, 02:00
Might be time to change your approach to the problem.

http://www.accurateshooter.com/gear-reviews/target-video-camera/

http://bullseyecamera.com

jjrothWA
07-22-2014, 08:49
If the target is just paper, put a another backer behind it ti reflect h=thru the shot-holes.

Jim in Salt Lake
07-23-2014, 10:27
+1 on the Bullseye camera system. Works as advertised and I've used it at 1000 yards. They came out with Android app this summer so I use my phone on the line to see the target. Takes about 5 minutes to set up.