View Full Version : RLB or R L B......?
ElWoodman
09-18-2016, 09:44
What is the significance of The bowed RLB, and the spaced, unboxed R L B on Remington stocks? Did one come first? If so which......Thankyou in advance....
Kragrifle
09-19-2016, 04:57
Boxed RLB, then unboxed RLB then spread RLB (last two may be reversed). Maybe Frank Beard will step in here.
Rick the Librarian
09-19-2016, 05:56
I believe JB said that the boxed and unboxed RLB were close but I know the "spread" RLB (R L B) came last.
John Beard
09-19-2016, 09:34
The order of appearance was:
(1) Boxed RLB
(2) Unboxed spread R L B
(3) Unboxed RLB
Overlap exists.
J.B.
Kragrifle
09-20-2016, 04:40
John, my apologies !
Rick the Librarian
09-20-2016, 05:13
Interesting ...in my (admitted unscientific) observation of mid-ranged Remington M1903s, I usually see "spread" RLB stamps on later rifles than the other two.
John Beard
09-20-2016, 09:32
John, my apologies !
No apologies necessary.
J.B.
What are the respective serial ranges or expected dates?
ElWoodman
09-26-2016, 09:37
SN 3169935, 8/42 barrel.
Rick the Librarian
09-27-2016, 06:03
I'd say a "spread" RLB.
FWIW, My Remington 1903 has an unboxed "RLB" that is neatly stamped, aligned, and closely spaced. Serial # is 3185260 and barrel date of 7-42. Beard says "overlap" exists which sounds likely. Maybe Remington had more than one worker using the RLB stamps ( pure conjecture on my part).
And another - SN 3223808 9-42 Unboxed RLB I suppose this would be considered an overlap into FJA territory as far as the stock goes, but I've had it for a long time - 1963. I've seen one or two other 10-42 RLB, but couldn't say if they were original.
Rick the Librarian
09-28-2016, 04:34
Usually, I thought FJA came in about 3,200,000 but with all the other "abnormalities" existing within Remington M1903s, I would be surprised a bit.
As I recall, Frank J. Atwood took over from Roy L. Bowlin about July, 1942, but, like with other markings there was certainly a time of "overlap.
Kragrifle
08-22-2017, 07:49
What about 3178222? Boxed RLB , no grasping grooves? Correct as original ?
John Beard
08-28-2017, 07:00
What about 3178222? Boxed RLB , no grasping grooves? Correct as original ?
A rifle not far from that serial number has been reliably reported with a boxed RLB. But the rifle is very much the exception and has not been authenticated.
J.B.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 4.2.5 Copyright © 2024 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.