PDA

View Full Version : Looking for bolt ID help



gnoahhh
10-28-2018, 05:11
I have a bolt with a straight handle, ordinance bomb on bottom side of bolt root, SN (or NS) stamped on bottom of safety lug, single small vent hole up forward. What era rifle would it be a proper fit for?

Thank you.

John Beard
10-28-2018, 06:42
Your bolt would be correct for a very late-1918 or 1919 Rock Island Model 1903 rifle.

J.B.

gnoahhh
10-28-2018, 08:39
Thank you very much.

Sunray
10-30-2018, 09:49
"...ordinance bomb"... OrdNANCE. An 'Ordinance' is a law.
You cannot just put a bolt into any rifle. Bolts require fitting for headspace by a gunsmith.

togor
11-01-2018, 04:45
You cannot just put a bolt into any rifle. Bolts require fitting for headspace by a gunsmith.

For '03s, my understanding is that headspace is set in the chamber. Unaware of a bolt based procedure beyond swapping bolts until one gives serviceable headspace. This after initial reaming of the chamber with a particular bolt.

From the happy coincidence department: one of my shooters is a Greek return, S/N 1.37M range, so Nickle Steel receiver. Independent of this I got a 3 bolt set of bolt bodies off of eBay, with one advertised as "NB" on the bolt handle. That NS bolt ran long on two of my HN rifles, but gauged right on with that CMP NS action. So they're together now in all of their gummy glory.

gnoahhh
11-19-2018, 07:29
For '03s, my understanding is that headspace is set in the chamber. Unaware of a bolt based procedure beyond swapping bolts until one gives serviceable headspace. This after initial reaming of the chamber with a particular bolt.

From the happy coincidence department: one of my shooters is a Greek return, S/N 1.37M range, so Nickle Steel receiver. Independent of this I got a 3 bolt set of bolt bodies off of eBay, with one advertised as "NB" on the bolt handle. That NS bolt ran long on two of my HN rifles, but gauged right on with that CMP NS action. So they're together now in all of their gummy glory.

In the "happy coincidence department", a late NS bolt came along with the above mentioned bolt in the deal. Out of curiosity I tried it in my 1903A1 which had a Remington bolt in it, said R bolt closed with the faintest resistance on a go-gauge, minimal headspace. The "new" NS bolt closed with the exact same resistance on the gauge. (And yes, the checks were made with just the stripped bolt bodies, no extractors.) They are now together in all their "gummy glory" also. The very best part of the story is that I got the pair of bolts for a paltry $40.

Sorry for the spelling error. My sainted Mom passed away on the day I wrote my initial post and I was trying my best to divert myself from the grief by engaging in some 'normal' gun talk.

togor
11-20-2018, 06:34
I'm sorry for your loss. Like nearly all mothers she is in a better place.

John Beard
11-20-2018, 11:32
I add my condolences on your mother's passing.

J.B.

Allen
11-20-2018, 12:36
My condolences on your mother's passing as well. Hopefully you got to keep her for a long time.

lyman
11-23-2018, 05:12
"...ordinance bomb"... OrdNANCE. An 'Ordinance' is a law.
You cannot just put a bolt into any rifle. Bolts require fitting for headspace by a gunsmith.

actually, for US Service weapons, they do not ,

just need to headspace to make sure and try a few if yours do not work (headspace correctly)

designed that way,

initial headspace is set when the barrel is installed, (chamber short, so it needs to be reamed)

fguffey
11-30-2018, 01:25
I have 35 03A3 bolts; there is not .001" difference in the effect each has on the length of the chamber from the shoulder of the chamber to the bolt face.

F. Guffey

fguffey
11-30-2018, 01:33
just need to headspace to make sure and try a few if yours do not work (headspace correctly)

designed that way,

I also have 2 boxes of 2 Brown and Sharp complete bolts. All 4 bolts are identical. If there was a plan to correct the length of the chamber with a bolt logic would dictate the bolts would be different.


F. Guffey

lyman
12-02-2018, 07:36
I also have 2 boxes of 2 Brown and Sharp complete bolts. All 4 bolts are identical. If there was a plan to correct the length of the chamber with a bolt logic would dictate the bolts would be different.


F. Guffey
if you gonna quote, quote the entire post, not take things out of perspective,

the 03 (and A3) were headspaced when barreled,
bolts designed to be swapped out, if needed, but not to need any adjustment or fitting, (just check headspace to make sure, due to manufacture tolerances etc)

unlike say in Enfield, that required the bolt head to be fitted,,

I've rebarreled, and worked on many a 1903 and 1903A3, there will be some variation in headspace when bolts are changed , likely due to wear on the receiver and barrel,

togor
12-04-2018, 05:28
I have a bolt/action chart that reminds me which bolts headspace how into which actions. Not all 03 bolts headspace the same. Given lots, maybe.

lyman
12-04-2018, 08:21
I have a bolt/action chart that reminds me which bolts headspace how into which actions. Not all 03 bolts headspace the same. Given lots, maybe.

would like to see that chart, could you post it?

togor
12-05-2018, 04:20
would like to see that chart, could you post it?

It's just for my own motley of bolts & actions! Not a general reference. Just which bolts show what when mated to which actions. I store the bolts in one place and the actions in another since things are a bit of a tight squeeze. So for example the BF9 fails a field gauge in the 1.37M action but won't close on a nogo in the 900K, and the NS bolt fails a go gauge in the 900K, and won't close on a nogo in the 1.37M. The rest of them are right in the middle somewhere, so I agree that random bolt swaps weren't a hazard to the troops. FWIW, both the BF9 and NS bolts were NOS when I got them, not hammered down from heavy usage.

lyman
12-05-2018, 07:28
It's just for my own motley of bolts & actions! Not a general reference. Just which bolts show what when mated to which actions. I store the bolts in one place and the actions in another since things are a bit of a tight squeeze. So for example the BF9 fails a field gauge in the 1.37M action but won't close on a nogo in the 900K, and the NS bolt fails a go gauge in the 900K, and won't close on a nogo in the 1.37M. The rest of them are right in the middle somewhere, so I agree that random bolt swaps weren't a hazard to the troops. FWIW, both the BF9 and NS bolts were NOS when I got them, not hammered down from heavy usage.

that variation was not likely from the bolts, but likely from the person reaming the barrel when it was installed,

togor
12-05-2018, 08:14
that variation was not likely from the bolts, but likely from the person reaming the barrel when it was installed,

Of course. I've mounted & headspaced barrels myself. The procedure is executed with a specific combination of receiver, barrel, bolt, reamer, and gauges. But obviously the bolts I mentioned in my post above are dimensionally different. If I can do an A/B comparison with the same set of gauges and get an internally consistent result, and the only thing changing is the bolt, then that is where the difference is. A difference of 0.010" is all it takes, and that can be had any number of ways.

fguffey
12-05-2018, 10:12
If I can do an A/B comparison with the same set of gauges and get an internally consistent result, and the only thing changing is the bolt, then that is where the difference is. A difference of 0.010" is all it takes, and that can be had any number of ways.

I have one 30/06 chamber that is .016" longer than a minimum length/full length sized case. I form 280 Remington cases to 30/06 cases and add .011" to the length of the case from the datum to the case head to get the magical .002" clearance.

.005" added to .011" is .002" longer than a field reject length gage.

F. Guffey

fguffey
12-05-2018, 10:26
if you gonna quote, quote the entire post, not take things out of perspective,

I have always though the saying "you need to purchases a bucket of bolts in case the first one does not fit' was cute. A resource person on military rifles has at least 100 03 bolts, I have 35 03A3 replacement bolts. If I needed a bolt to off set the length of the chamber by .004" I could tell him how to determine which bolt I needed; if he needed a bolt I would have to drove over and check the length of the chamber he was working on.

This stuff is not for everyone.

F. Guffey

- - - Updated - - -

and he has at least 20 30/06 head space gage: all I need is one and I showed him a head space gage is not necessary.

F. Guffey

togor
12-05-2018, 12:36
I have one 30/06 chamber that is .016" longer than a minimum length/full length sized case. I form 280 Remington cases to 30/06 cases and add .011" to the length of the case from the datum to the case head to get the magical .002" clearance.

.005" added to .011" is .002" longer than a field reject length gage.

F. Guffey

I have a G43 which easily closes on a 8mm field gauge. Its brass is resized .30-06 (Garand once fired is great since the G43 extraction cycle is really tough on brass), that I let run long. Those rounds still easily chamber in the G43 but in the bolt guns they would be very hard. So yeah us reloaders have alternatives for long headspace.

fguffey
12-05-2018, 02:46
I have a G43 which easily closes on a 8mm field gauge. Its brass is resized .30-06 (Garand once fired is great since the G43 extraction cycle is really tough on brass), that I let run long.

I have 16 forming dies; included in that bunch is a 8MM57 forming die. The nice feature of the forming die allows the die to be adjusted off the shell holder to increase the length of the case from the shoulder to the case head.

I could never figure how a reloader could miss when forming 30/06 to 8MM57 because the difference in length between the two chambers/cases is .127".

F. Guffey