Hi,

Whenever gun control or second amendment issues are discussed, I'm always a little bit staggered when I try to imagine just how many guns could conceivably sprout into the hands of ordinary citizens given just cause. (Ground invasion or whatnot.)Recently, I've found myself wondering whether this would actually be useful in a military situation, or maybe only serve as a deterrent to would-be invaders. Even if we couldn't inflict any real losses on invading troops, it sure would suck for them trying to move around with a pissed-off US Citizen armed with a hunting rifle taking pop shots at them at every turn.Now, I'm fairly ignorant in regards both to hunting and to military weapons. I've shot a handful of different handguns with various relatives, but I've never been hunting and my military experience was limited to the 1911, M-14, and 12 gauge shotgun.But I have to wonder: How many hundreds of thousands (if not millions) of people hunt deer and similar game every year? With their weapons and skills (presuming a fair number of them have a high level of proficiency), don't we have a country full of home-grown snipers? Wouldn't a good hunter be a fairly formidable sniper? I figure hunting rifles are accurate at a reasonably long range, they are scoped, and a good hunter is patient, knows a bit about camoflage, and is somewhat proficient at blending in with his surroundings.What do you all think?

Please help.

I didn't find the right solution from the Internet.

References:-
https://arstechnica.com/civis/viewto...?f=24&t=902881
Product Video Service

Thanks!