Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    1,371

    Default All Quiet On The Western Front

    Yesterday, Veterans Day, I watched the third film version of Erich Maria Remarque's 1929 book, All Quiet On The Western Front. I have never read the book. The original is in German, which I do not speak/read. I have, however, seen the 1930 B/W film of the same name. And again in 1979, a television movie of the same name starring Richard Thomas and Ernest Borgnine. All good. This latest iteration released this year is a 2.5 hr. color version in German. I don't mind subtitles, so this was an easy pick for a lazy, rainy Veterans Day. The story doesn't vary much from the book or other earlier films, but the delivery is grittier and more horrific in its depiction of WWI trench fighting gore. There's always some technical, weapon-related goofs that irritate, but overall was realistic in how rifles, machine guns and armor of the period functioned and sounded. I will let you find your own faults, but here are a couple that irked me. As an owner of a Mauser in 8mm, I was annoyed with the lack of kick of the rifles in the film. Even Hollywood doesn't get this right, so let's move on. At one point, the main character was aiming at entrenched French enemy and was aiming down the sights with the rifle on "safe," with the safety selector vertical blocking his line of sight. On the other hand, they used realistic-looking French armor like the St. Chamond with its famous 75mm forward gun. They may have been CGI, but they looked great and are rarely seen in film. Anyway...best film I have seen in a while and wanted to draw it to your attention.

    Edited to add a teaser:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qFqgmaO15x4
    Last edited by Liam; 11-12-2022 at 08:30. Reason: sp
    "Wars are, of course, as a rule to be avoided; but they are far better than certain kinds of peace." - T.R.

  2. #2

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Liam View Post
    . . . . . .The story doesn't vary much from the book or other earlier films, . . . . .
    I couldn’t DISAGREE with you more . . . . .

    I also watched the two previous films and thought they were much, much better than this Netflix “bomb.”

    The first 1930 film was better than the 1979 version.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    3,742

    Default

    All three movies are excellent. Each has features that are not found in the other. Absolutely shocked when first viewed original version. Thunder struck might better describe my reaction. Very much enjoyed second film. Not so gritty. Ending is very good. Third version is extremely well done. Not sure if French were using flame throwers to such an extent. Sincerely. bruce.
    " Unlike most conservatives, libs have no problem exploiting dead children and dancing on their graves."

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •