Springfield 1911

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • barretcreek
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2013
    • 6065

    #1

    Springfield 1911

    Friend says he's got a Springfield 1911, not 1911a. Didn't know they made any.
  • Randy
    Member
    • Dec 2016
    • 87

    #2
    Yes. There's a M1911 and A M1911a1. It's one of the few modifications made over the years.

    Comment

    • Chaz
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2009
      • 765

      #3
      Yes, Springfield Armory made 1911s

      The Armory made batches of them between 1914 and 1917. But it didn't produce 1911A1s.
      SA 1911 004.jpgSA 1911 002.jpg

      Comment

      • PhillipM
        Very Senior Member - OFC
        • Aug 2009
        • 5937

        #4
        The original 1911 contract with Colt specified that 1/3 of every order was to be made at Springfield Armory. This went on until 1917 when the world found out Springfield Armory couldn't supply the Army with enough rifles to fight WWI, so they discontinued them to concentrate on 1903 production.
        Phillip McGregor (OFC)
        "I am neither a fire arms nor a ballistics expert, but I was a combat infantry officer in the Great War, and I absolutely know that the bullet from an infantry rifle has to be able to shoot through things." General Douglas MacArthur

        Comment

        • Johnny P
          Senior Member
          • Aug 2009
          • 6259

          #5
          The contract specified that after Colt had produced 50,000 of the Model 1911 pistols that Springfield Armory "had the right" to manufacture up to 1/3 of the 1911 pistols, but it was not a requirement. Colt reached 50,000 pistols in October of 1913, but Springfield never came close to manufacturing the number of pistols they were allowed. Less than 26,000 pistols were manufactured from 1914 to 1917. Springfield also had to pay a royalty of $2 per pistol to Colt.

          Comment

          • macPA
            Senior Member
            • Aug 2009
            • 157

            #6
            Have one that was one on the last ones sold
            by the DCM. Has all paper work as well as a flier
            explaining that no more will be sold through the program

            Comment

            • Johnny P
              Senior Member
              • Aug 2009
              • 6259

              #7
              Late Springfield



              Comment

              • PhillipM
                Very Senior Member - OFC
                • Aug 2009
                • 5937

                #8
                Thanks for the info, Johnny P.

                126353 doesn't look as good as yours. I've seen conflicting data. Have you a production date? Also, are all the eagles somewhat lightly struck?

                20161215_213434.jpg
                Last edited by PhillipM; 12-15-2016, 07:41.
                Phillip McGregor (OFC)
                "I am neither a fire arms nor a ballistics expert, but I was a combat infantry officer in the Great War, and I absolutely know that the bullet from an infantry rifle has to be able to shoot through things." General Douglas MacArthur

                Comment

                • Johnny P
                  Senior Member
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 6259

                  #9
                  Springfield Armory did not keep a detailed record of their pistol production like Colt, and Springfield only issued a yearly report of pistols produced. The Springfield shown falls into the 1917 reported range of 125587 to 127798.

                  The eagle stamp on the Springfield Model 1911 slide is never deep due to it's large size compared to a single letter or number. Trying to stamp it deeper would probably result in a bent slide.

                  One of the stranger reasons for the delay of pistol production at Springfield Armory was setting up a production line for the Model 1913 or "Patton Saber". Military minds work in strange ways.

                  Comment

                  • CPC
                    Senior Member
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 365

                    #10
                    Johnny, that is a beautiful pistol. Thank you for sharing.

                    Comment

                    • Johnny P
                      Senior Member
                      • Aug 2009
                      • 6259

                      #11
                      Originally posted by CPC
                      Johnny, that is a beautiful pistol. Thank you for sharing.
                      Thanks. It came in a General Officer's holster, but I could never trace it's history.

                      Comment

                      • Scott Gahimer
                        Senior Member
                        • Sep 2009
                        • 899

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Johnny P
                        Springfield Armory did not keep a detailed record of their pistol production like Colt, and Springfield only issued a yearly report of pistols produced. The Springfield shown falls into the 1917 reported range of 125587 to 127798. ...
                        I believe 125567-127130 is reported as being procured between July 1 and December 31, 1916 on page 392 in Clawson's big book. He shows only 848 pistols produced in the 1917 procurement report covering Jan 1 through June 30 that year. He notes, however, that production actually terminated April 15, 1917.

                        Is there conflicting information somewhere else?
                        Last edited by Scott Gahimer; 12-16-2016, 09:54.

                        Solutions for M1911 Buyers & Sellers

                        Comment

                        • Johnny P
                          Senior Member
                          • Aug 2009
                          • 6259

                          #13
                          Page 193 of Meadow's U.S. Military Automatic Pistols 1894-1920 lists serial numbers 125587-127998 as 1917 production. This by fiscal year, and not by calendar year.

                          Comment

                          • Scott Gahimer
                            Senior Member
                            • Sep 2009
                            • 899

                            #14
                            Thanks. I appreciate that. I hadn't considered the fiscal year thing.

                            Solutions for M1911 Buyers & Sellers

                            Comment

                            Working...