Remington Rand 1911A1

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Calfed
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2009
    • 734

    #1

    Remington Rand 1911A1

    I got this a few weeks ago on auction. It has some non original parts, but it looks like it might be correctible.










    Anyone familiar with this barrel nomeclature?
    ...a fool and his money were lucky to get together in the first place...
  • Ken Hill
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2011
    • 208

    #2
    Looks like a good honest gun. I'd leave it as it is.
    /Ken Hill

    "Reason is not automatic. Those that deny it cannot be conquered by it!" Ayn Rand

    Comment

    • ignats
      Senior Member
      • Sep 2009
      • 241

      #3
      The trigger and magazine are both wrong and easy to replace the barrel could be easily explained as a replacement but it shouldn't that hard to get hold of an HS barrel in decent condition.

      Comment

      • Johnny P
        Senior Member
        • Aug 2009
        • 6259

        #4
        Slide is off a later Remington Rand.

        Comment

        • Ken Hill
          Senior Member
          • Aug 2011
          • 208

          #5
          Originally posted by Johnny P
          Slide is off a later Remington Rand.
          Johnny, Good to see you back!
          /Ken Hill

          "Reason is not automatic. Those that deny it cannot be conquered by it!" Ayn Rand

          Comment

          • five 0
            Member
            • Aug 2009
            • 55

            #6
            Originally posted by Johnny P
            Slide is off a later Remington Rand.
            Clawson's book shows the same slide on RR NO. 1286700 in his book. The above is NO. 1596980 which is later than the pistol in his book. Is Clawson incorrect?

            Comment

            • Johnny P
              Senior Member
              • Aug 2009
              • 6259

              #7
              Originally posted by five 0
              Clawson's book shows the same slide on RR NO. 1286700 in his book. The above is NO. 1596980 which is later than the pistol in his book. Is Clawson incorrect?
              Clawson is not incorrect, and he doesn't show the same slide. The slide in your photos shows the Blanchard milling on the sides of the slide in large semi-circular machining marks. This was not initiated by Remington Rand until several months after your pistol was produced. The slide also appears to the the lighter color of the late 1945 production Remington Rands, a shade or two lighter than the receiver.

              Comment

              • Calfed
                Senior Member
                • Nov 2009
                • 734

                #8
                Thanks for all the feedback, guys.

                A few years ago the CMP was talking about selling the mixmaster 1911's that they have. Obama put a stop to that, but before he did, the CMP implied that their 1911's would start at about a grand.

                I was able to beat that price on this one, although not by much.
                Last edited by Calfed; 07-16-2017, 08:59.
                ...a fool and his money were lucky to get together in the first place...

                Comment

                • Johnny P
                  Senior Member
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 6259

                  #9
                  Add up all the parts you need, deduct what you can get for the replaced parts, add the difference to what you originally paid and you will have your true price.

                  55 years ago a high percentage of the NRA/DCM .45's were rebuilt Model 1911 pistols. Will have to wait and see what a grand buys.

                  Comment

                  • Mikecp
                    Member
                    • Dec 2012
                    • 33

                    #10
                    Your frame dated to August 1944, as said by JohnnyP the slide with Blanchard circular marks is appeared end of 1944 (Nov/Dec)
                    MSH for this period should be serrated like the slide stop with 8 ribs.
                    CCA Member
                    Pro TELL

                    Comment

                    • SPEEDGUNNER
                      Senior Member
                      • Sep 2009
                      • 729

                      #11
                      I like it. Good honest wear. These pistols were built, rebuilt and rebuilt again through 3 wars and countless conflicts over the past 70 years. Get a correct WWII barrel and mag and leave the rest alone. Enjoy.
                      "There's a race of men that don't fit in,
                      A race that can't stay still;
                      So they break the hearts of kith and kin,
                      And they roam the world at will." - Robert Service

                      Comment

                      • Johnny P
                        Senior Member
                        • Aug 2009
                        • 6259

                        #12
                        If it is accepted as having been rebuilt, no need to change the barrel, as it is a GI replacement. Although, the color of the slide and receiver should match on a rebuild.

                        Comment

                        Working...