Lightweight hammers?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Guamsst
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2010
    • 9753

    #1

    Lightweight hammers?

    I was looking at custom parts and saw some adds for lightweight high speed hammers. My thought was that a lightweight hammer at a higher speed should have roughly the same force as a standard hammer. What is the benefit, if any, of a lightweight hammer?

    I just want one because they look cool. I'm ok with that. But I'd like to know WHY I'm supposed to want one.
    I own firearms not to fight against my government, but to ensure I will not have to.
  • seagoatami
    Senior Member
    • Jan 2010
    • 376

    #2
    I dont knoooooooooow ??????????

    Comment

    • Bill H
      Member
      • Sep 2012
      • 94

      #3
      Most likely the same reason they make titanium (lightweight) strikers for Mausers, they travel faster, and thereby reduce lock time.

      Comment

      • emmagee1917
        Senior Member
        • Sep 2009
        • 1492

        #4
        They allow the ex-sperts to hit faster and the rest of us to miss faster.
        Chris

        Comment

        • Guamsst
          Senior Member
          • Nov 2010
          • 9753

          #5
          Originally posted by emmagee1917
          They allow the ex-sperts to hit faster and the rest of us to miss faster.
          Chris
          LOL!!! I see.

          It makes sense now. Less chance for you to ever so slightly move the weapon while the hammer is inbound. For the prices I've seen, I'm all over it now.
          I own firearms not to fight against my government, but to ensure I will not have to.

          Comment

          • Johnny P
            Senior Member
            • Aug 2009
            • 6259

            #6
            Fits right in there with the ambidextrous safety, beavertail grip safety, large button mag release, and beveled mag well.

            Comment

            • Guamsst
              Senior Member
              • Nov 2010
              • 9753

              #7
              The ambidextrius safety is out.

              I considered the beavertail grip safety and since my hands are kinda small, I'm all over the extended mag release.

              I think I will just polish my factory trigger and drill my own holes in it. If I screw it up, I won't be out much anyways. I like the mag well, just not sure how it will fit with the RIA 8rd mag. Speaking of which....I'm off to the back room to see if i have a bunch of cheap 7rd mags still. Probably not, after all, I can use them now...LOL
              I own firearms not to fight against my government, but to ensure I will not have to.

              Comment

              • Guamsst
                Senior Member
                • Nov 2010
                • 9753

                #8
                Can I assume this is the same reason people "Bob" their hammers? or is that just to cut down on the chances of snagging the hammer on something?
                I own firearms not to fight against my government, but to ensure I will not have to.

                Comment

                • John Sukey
                  Very Senior Member - OFC Deceased
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 12224

                  #9
                  Browning did an excellent job when he designed the gun. It has served through several wars without all the add on doo-dads. the addition of target sights are the only improvememt I can think of for target work.

                  Comment

                  • da gimp
                    Very Senior Member - OFC Deceased
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 10137

                    #10
                    there have been problems with light/insufficent primer hits with the light hammers. wouldn't put one on a carry gun for this reason..............it'd only take 1 to give you a really, really bad day, if you needed it when something went bad.....same with adj triggers with almost no overtravel.............there have been problems with bounce firing.......
                    be safe, enjoy life, journey well
                    da gimp
                    OFC, Mo. Chapter

                    Comment

                    • Ken Hill
                      Senior Member
                      • Aug 2011
                      • 208

                      #11
                      In the sixties John Giles used a lightweight hammer, milled from a standard factory hammer on his Bullseye pistols. They were an advantage especially on the mid range builds, especially when combined with the carbide tipped sear and other gunsmithing refinements that allowed him to lower spring weights and create a crisp trigger that assured a perfect repeatable trigger. These pistols were made for (and won) national match competitions and were never built for self defense. Magazines were all tuned to feed and extract flawlessly when loaded with five rounds. The triggers were not as sturdy as milspec and not up to factory or milspec loads.

                      One of his great sayings regarding full length guide rods was "that they help in feeding and extraction ... feeding my family and extracting money from you wallet."
                      /Ken Hill

                      "Reason is not automatic. Those that deny it cannot be conquered by it!" Ayn Rand

                      Comment

                      • Guamsst
                        Senior Member
                        • Nov 2010
                        • 9753

                        #12
                        Thanks for the info guys. I won't be carrying this one until I put a few hundred rounds through it. The great thing about the 1911 is that if it does fail it can still be used as a deadly hammer.
                        I own firearms not to fight against my government, but to ensure I will not have to.

                        Comment

                        Working...