Strangely quiet

[blackhawknj]

It's them for THEM to start bending for US!
The magazine ban legislation in NJ failed to make an LEO exemption, so theoretically cops could be prosecuted for using/carrying a duty magazine off-duty.
The main goal is to create a Surveillance and Snitch society, sow fear, mistrust.
You take a forbidden magazine-or a bump stock, wipe it clean, plant it and maybe a couple of nickel bags in the trunk of an anti-gunner, then....

[RED]

And how is it "Trump's" ban

OK guys, here it is. Do you support the President’s bump stock ban?

It didn't originate with him. His advisors polled the question and something like 46% of Americans support the ban and another 30% don't give a $h!t which means the ban is unopposed by over 75% of Americans. Trump said OK, I'll go along.

The bump stock is worthless anyway. It has been proven worthless along with the full auto M-14 that didn't work and the M-16 which has been restricted to a 3 round burst for a reason. A shooter with an off the shelf AR firing aimed shots, is round for round far deadlier than somebody using a bump stock. The "ban," is pretty much meaningless because a couple of rubber bands and a piece of velcro will make about any semi-auto do the same thing.

[Vern Humphrey]

OK guys, here it is. Do you support the President’s bump stock ban?

No. It violates both the 2nd and 5th Amendments (since it takes private property without due process of law or compensation.)

[lyman]

It's them for THEM to start bending for US!
The magazine ban legislation in NJ failed to make an LEO exemption, so theoretically cops could be prosecuted for using/carrying a duty magazine off-duty.
The main goal is to create a Surveillance and Snitch society, sow fear, mistrust.
You take a forbidden magazine-or a bump stock, wipe it clean, plant it and maybe a couple of nickel bags in the trunk of an anti-gunner, then....

I spoke to a gentleman today that left NJ years ago, his brother is some kind of LEO , still in NJ, and was told he had to turn in all his high cap mags for his off duty guns,
then he told me the Gov signed some addendum to the law that said off duty LEO could carry a high cap mag as long as it was 17 rnds or less,

- - - Updated - - -

It didn't originate with him. His advisors polled the question and something like 46% of Americans support the ban and another 30% don't give a $h!t which means the ban is unopposed by over 75% of Americans. Trump said OK, I'll go along.

The bump stock is worthless anyway. It has been proven worthless along with the full auto M-14 that didn't work and the M-16 which has been restricted to a 3 round burst for a reason. A shooter with an off the shelf AR firing aimed shots, is round for round far deadlier than somebody using a bump stock. The "ban," is pretty much meaningless because a couple of rubber bands and a piece of velcro will make about any semi-auto do the same thing.

here is what really hurts us, re the bump stocks,

I spoke to a young man the other day,
he had asked me what he should do with his bump stock,

I told him to do some research , and see if there was a place designated to turn them in or what the process was, (I have not looked for that info, since I don't and did not sell them)
Guy comments that he had misplaced the original parts to his AR, so would have to replace them, and that he hunted Coyotes with his AR,

Bump Stock installed,,,,

He said that if he missed the Yote with the first couple shots he used the bumpstock and cranked them out,,

since I work retail, and for a company during the day that is not my own , I just commented he may want to practice his marksmanship skills a bit more, and not use a bumpstock for hunting,


fools like that are what cause the headlines, issues, drama, and give the rest of us a bad name