Ivanka is now finally a

[lyman]

Beto I notice didn't get very far.

things may change if Biden gets the office,


wasn't he one of the senators that pushed the AWB in 94?

[togor]

Obama was anti-gun. Yet he didn't just write new law in the DOJ regs. Trump did, when guns became a revenue threat to his industry (hospitality). If believe that if guns hurt Trump's bottom line he would clamp down on them in the blink of a raccoon's eye.

[lyman]

Obama was anti-gun. Yet he didn't just write new law in the DOJ regs. Trump did, when guns became a revenue threat to his industry (hospitality). If believe that if guns hurt Trump's bottom line he would clamp down on them in the blink of a raccoon's eye.

Trump has already been quoted as a gun grabber from before he was even considering running for office,

- - - Updated - - -

Obama was anti-gun. Yet he didn't just write new law in the DOJ regs. Trump did, when guns became a revenue threat to his industry (hospitality). If believe that if guns hurt Trump's bottom line he would clamp down on them in the blink of a raccoon's eye.

Trump has already been quoted as a gun grabber( legislature wise) from before he was even considering running for office,


but he has never come out and said he would come and take them,

beto has, as have the rest of the Dem candidates (all trying to outdo each other)


Trump very well make a move like Bush and drop an EO or 2 here and there that will hurt us,

but I don't think it is on his agenda to do anything even remotely close to Biden/beto/bloomberg

[togor]

Remember this?

Take the guns first, go through due process second

[lyman]

Remember this?

absolutely

[rayg]

If I recall, I thought he said that if and when, some one demonstrates that he may be a danger to the public and owns guns. The police should be able to remove him from his guns pending a court hearing to see if there was just cause to do so...I don't see anything wrong with that.

[lyman]

If I recall, I thought he said that if and when, some one demonstrates that he may be a danger to the public and owns guns. The police should be able to remove him from his guns pending a court hearing to see if there was just cause to do so...I don't see anything wrong with that.

so you are OK with Red Flag laws?


that was what the context was about

[rayg]

Don't remember what the other post was, but I would be Ok that the police should be able to remove the guns via a court order after a hearing to see if there was JUST cause to do so. When I was in law enforcement before I retired, we could hold a person for a number of days who demonstrated either a danger to themselves or others and to take possession of his guns on a temporary basis or have them removed to another family members location not at his house until the court decide's whether there was just cause to do so....Don't know if times and procedures have changed, but that was 20 yrs ago..

[lyman]

Don't remember what the other post was, but I would be Ok that the police should be able to remove the guns via a court order after a hearing to see if there was JUST cause to do so. When I was in law enforcement before I retired, we could hold a person for a number of days who demonstrated either a danger to themselves or others and to take possession of his guns on a temporary basis or have them removed to another family members location not at his house until the court decide's whether there was just cause to do so....Don't know if times and procedures have changed, but that was 20 yrs ago..

SOP now seems to be bust the doors in at 4am and kill the homeowner and his dog

[rayg]

SOP now seems to be bust the doors in at 4am and kill the homeowner and his dog

Lyman, you say that is now Standard Procedure?