A view from a Vancouver cop

[lyman]

Tuna if you want to explain what I'm missing and why it matters to the bottom line of how the police are perceived by the communities they're paid to serve, well here I am.

Because there is a bottom line and the police don't have the authority to unilaterally decide where it is. If they did, then this would be a police state.

Speaking of police states, nobody likes the idea of living in one, but the phrase means different things to different people. To many here, 3 words would do it: Universal Firearms Registry. To other people, mostly not members here, it's what happened to George Floyd, or Philando Castile, or countless others, of all colors.

Seems to me people with a common concern about law enforcement overreach should stick together.

not sure where you are going with firearms registry comments, but that really is a totally different issue, and totally different mindset, than anything else discussed in this thread

you are either trying to flame some folks, your ADHD has kicked in, or you are backpedaling ,,, (as in loosing the argument)

don't twist and turn this, listen to ray and tuna


and take a break from MSM

just a thought