Some Taliban are trading their AKs for M16s ...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • dogtag
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 14985

    #1

    Some Taliban are trading their AKs for M16s ...

    I wouldn't have thought that a good idea although I don't own either rifle
    so I'm not much of an authority on either. I have an SP1 but I guess they're now relics.


    The Thomson Reuters Foundation stands for free, independent journalism, human rights, women's empowerment, and the rule of law.
  • lyman
    Administrator - OFC
    • Aug 2009
    • 11268

    #2
    that's like the 9mm vs 45 or Ford vs Chevy debates as far as which is the best,


    tho folks I konw that were there, say they would have liked something with a just a bit more distance

    Comment

    • Art
      Senior Member, Deceased
      • Dec 2009
      • 9256

      #3
      One of the reasons for the new preference of U.S. gear could be that the M4s the Taliban have now are completely tricked out with optics, infra red indicators, lights and stuff. I saw video this morning of two Taliban fighters carrying M4s in just that configuration. In the video of the Taliban briefing there was an old boy with an M16A4. It had no extras at all on it and looked very clean. Could he have gotten it directly from an arms room??

      Lyman:

      I think our guys in Afghanistan would like more range, but I don't think they'll willingly pay the weight penalty to get it. Current U.S. soldiers call the M16 "the musket," not complimentary.
      Last edited by Art; 08-18-2021, 05:18.

      Comment

      • Vern Humphrey
        Administrator - OFC
        • Aug 2009
        • 15875

        #4
        Originally posted by lyman
        that's like the 9mm vs 45 or Ford vs Chevy debates as far as which is the best,


        tho folks I konw that were there, say they would have liked something with a just a bit more distance
        And more penetration -- Eugene Stoner didn't realize the bastards will get behind cover when the shooting starts.

        Comment

        • lyman
          Administrator - OFC
          • Aug 2009
          • 11268

          #5
          Originally posted by Art
          One of the reasons for the new preference of U.S. gear could be that the M4s the Taliban have now are completely tricked out with optics, infra red indicators, lights and stuff. I saw video this morning of two Taliban fighters carrying M4s in just that configuration. In the video of the Taliban briefing there was an old boy with an M16A4. It had no extras at all on it and looked very clean. Could he have gotten it directly from an arms room??

          Lyman:

          I think our guys in Afghanistan would like more range, but I don't think they'll willingly pay the weight penalty to get it. Current U.S. soldiers call the M16 "the musket," not complimentary.
          had a few young guys in the shop not long ago,

          they were Army, out of FT Lee,

          they referred to the A2's I had on the wall as muskets,

          the AR's in what, to them, is normal, (16" Mforgeries) were called (by them) M4's

          Comment

          • dryheat
            Senior Member
            • Sep 2009
            • 10587

            #6
            I doubt they are trading but building up and interesting gun collection.
            If I should die before I wake...great,a little more sleep.

            Comment

            • barretcreek
              Senior Member
              • Sep 2013
              • 6065

              #7
              Good, Taliban will be deaf soon.

              Comment

              • dryheat
                Senior Member
                • Sep 2009
                • 10587

                #8
                Deaf and dumb. That's bad combination.
                If I should die before I wake...great,a little more sleep.

                Comment

                Working...