A large number, perhaps the majority of firearms used by criminals barred by law from possessing them, are bought through intermediaries, usually girlfriends or wives as "straw man" transactions. Interestingly only the straw purchaser has legal liability not the recipient who provided the money. Kyle Rittenhouse obtained the rifle he used through an illegal "straw man" purchase for which the fellow who conducted the actual purchase with Rittenhouse's money has actually been charged, not Federally, but in state court on charges of providing a weapon to a minor. I'll guarantee if it had been possible to prosecute Rittenhouse for his part in the purchase it would have been done.
Most gun rights organizations support the prosecution of "straw" purchases - - so why doesn't it happen? I mean this is low hanging fruit.
The best explanation of why it doesn't happen is the nature of the purchasers. Nobody in power wants to answer for locking up large numbers of women, especially minority women.
Most gun rights organizations support the prosecution of "straw" purchases - - so why doesn't it happen? I mean this is low hanging fruit.
The best explanation of why it doesn't happen is the nature of the purchasers. Nobody in power wants to answer for locking up large numbers of women, especially minority women.

Comment