??? on this stock, 1898 carbine version??

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Sgt. Rob
    Junior Member
    • Mar 2013
    • 15

    #1

    ??? on this stock, 1898 carbine version??

    So if you read my other post, I have an original 1896 carbine that I am going to attempt to restore. In doing so I picked up this sporter Krag at the gun show last weeekend, armed with enough knowledge to be dangerous. I thought this was an original 1896 stock on this sporter, but now realize given the bolt handle cutout, I think its an 1898?? Which, per reading old posts here, will not fit an 1896 action. So, is this stock too far gone with the sanding and sling swivels to have any value?? Would there be a trade possibility for an 1896 stock, or should I go to the trouble to make this one fit?? It appears that 1898 carbines are the rarest, and if this is an 1898 stock that could be salvaged by someone I am open to trades, but would like to know a value so as not to get taken, or take advantage of someone else. Really appreciate any help!















    The only marking left is this small number "27" by the triggerguard. The cartouch and proof P have ben sanded away.




    Just out of curiosity if someone wants to check the SRS the serial number on the action is 481065. If it comes up interesting I will eventually restore it to a rifle. If not it will be the basis for my youngest sons first deer rifle.

    Thanks for any help here Gents.

    Semper Fi, Rob
  • dave
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2009
    • 6778

    #2
    Those stocks are rather hard to find and expensive. Weren't stocks sanded during rebuild? Swevil holes can be filled. While it certainly has less value then a un-molested stock it worth something, to someone who needs one badly! How much is a tough question I will not attemp to answer!
    You can never go home again.

    Comment

    • madsenshooter
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2009
      • 1476

      #3
      That stock doesn't appear to have been sanded much, note the crisp edges to the finger grooves. It would be a proper stock for the rare model 98 carbine, so yes it has substantial value to someone. Could be it has no cartouche or proof mark because it was a field replacement stock. The sling holes would be easy to fill, least the cut out isn't for the GI swivel base.
      Last edited by madsenshooter; 03-06-2013, 03:24.
      "I have sworn upon the Altar of God, eternity hostility upon all forms of tyranny over the minds of man." - Thomas Jefferson

      Comment

      • Sgt. Rob
        Junior Member
        • Mar 2013
        • 15

        #4
        Thank you for the information on this post as well Madsenshooter. I had not thought of the possibility of a field replacement. I hope it works out that I can trade it for proper Model 1896 stock and parts or sell it to finance the search for them. I have very little hope of finding an 1898 carbine where I could use it myself. Seems they are very rare. I feel real lucky to have what I do in my 1896 carbine. (see seperate post)

        Semper Fi, Rob

        Comment

        • jon_norstog
          Senior Member
          • Sep 2009
          • 3896

          #5
          Sgt. Rob, that's a nice-looking piece of wood on that "carbine" there. Too bad about the missing and added hardware. OTOH the whole setup looks really good to me - the barreled action looks great, the wood is there too. I agree with Madsen - it takes a lot of sanding to eliminate the cartouche completely and I don't see the signs of that, for instance in your last picture.

          From the pictures it looks like a Bannerman front sight on that piece. If so it could indicate it was put together from a cutdown rifle and a field replacement stock, probably years and years ago. About the swivels and the missing "saddle ring." It looks to me as if someone set it up for hunting but didn't use it much, or used it in a dry climate. Or they might have been part of the original hack job.

          I expect we'll hear more on this one from Dick and 5MF.

          jn

          Comment

          • Dick Hosmer
            Very Senior Member - OFC
            • Aug 2009
            • 5993

            #6
            FWIW, I do not believe that many, if in fact any at all, "field replacement" stocks were made, or utilized, in the unique 98C configuration. There may have been over-runs which were sold off, but I'm pretty sure that any 1898 Carbine requiring a new stock due to breakage or wear would have been treated to a new 32" 1899-type stock, along with all the rest of them.

            Comment

            • madsenshooter
              Senior Member
              • Aug 2009
              • 1476

              #7
              The Bannerman sight might be pointing in the right direction, I imagine he bought a large portion of the surplus stocks. I have seen 98 carbines in 99 stocks, or cutoff rifle stocks rather than the proper stock. Someone will be interested in it. Perhaps 5 has some info to contribute about field replacement stocks for the 98C. Had to have had some, I would think, as the 98 carbines were being made a year before the 99C stock was approved in August 1899, but it could be as Dick said, just an over run. Either way, it is what it is, and Sgt Rob has made a very lucky find. Glad he stopped by here before selling it. The stock could bring more than what you paid for the whole shebang and help with the 96C project.
              "I have sworn upon the Altar of God, eternity hostility upon all forms of tyranny over the minds of man." - Thomas Jefferson

              Comment

              • Mark Daiute
                Senior Member
                • Aug 2009
                • 654

                #8
                I'm a little tempted to try and get it (that stock) from the OP for my 1898 carbine in the 1899 replacement stock. That OP's stock sure is pretty, too pretty, really, for my 1898 carbine.
                "A man with a tractor and a chain saw has no excuses, nor does he need any"
                Me. "Consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds" Emerson "Consistency is the darling of those that stack wood or cast bullets" Me.

                Comment

                • Sgt. Rob
                  Junior Member
                  • Mar 2013
                  • 15

                  #9
                  I am debating putting it up on ebay, but would rather if possible, trade it for an 1896 carbine stock and possibly other parts depending on condition.

                  Other then that, would it be considered bad if I modified this one to fit my 1896 action? Or would that be ruining something too valuable? What Krag parts dealers or collectors should I contact?

                  Thank You Gentlemen

                  Semper Fi, Rob

                  Comment

                  • Dick Hosmer
                    Very Senior Member - OFC
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 5993

                    #10
                    I have a quite decent 32" stock with 1896 inletting, which also has no cartouche, that I'd be willing to trade in some manner. I also may have some other parts you need. You need a 32" stock for that rear sight anyhow. It would be a sin to gouge out that stock.

                    SORRY, I withdraw the trade offer - I forgot about the holes that need to be plugged.
                    Last edited by Dick Hosmer; 03-08-2013, 07:58.

                    Comment

                    • Sgt. Rob
                      Junior Member
                      • Mar 2013
                      • 15

                      #11
                      Since it already has the holes, then would it still be a sin to modify it?

                      Semper Fi, Rob

                      Comment

                      • Ned Butts
                        Senior Member
                        • Feb 2010
                        • 175

                        #12
                        YES!!!! The holes are a minor issue on a rarely seen stock that is in otherwise very good shape!

                        Comment

                        • Sgt. Rob
                          Junior Member
                          • Mar 2013
                          • 15

                          #13
                          If the holes are a minor issue, I would think it a worth while trade for a 32" stock. But apparently to the other fella it would not be. (point of the trade is moot, as I want to keep original appearance anyway) And the carbine stock is not going on this rifle, see my post on the 1896 Carbine I have. I bought this rifle for the stock to use on the 1896 Carbine, and the rear sight to replace the broken one on my 1898 rifle project. The rifle pictured with this stock will end up in something cheap from ebay or GB down the road and used as my youngest boys deer rifle.

                          Later this weekend, I will post up the stock in the classifieds here and entertain offers, see what happens. Truth is, I think it will be hard for someone to come up with an 1896 Carbine stock in simialar condition to trade.

                          Semper Fi, Rob

                          Comment

                          • 5MadFarmers
                            Senior Member
                            • Nov 2009
                            • 2815

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Sgt. Rob
                            Truth is, I think it will be hard for someone to come up with an 1896 Carbine stock in simialar condition to trade.

                            Semper Fi, Rob
                            No. Simple numbers tell you otherwise. 5,000 1898 carbines were made and that stock is unique to them. Over 20,000 1896 carbine stocks were made. Obviously 1896 carbine stocks are more often encountered.

                            It would be a very silly thing to do to modify that stock. Burn a couple 100 dollar bills - same difference.

                            That gun has a rear sight you mention you intend to use but it's missing the hand guard - not an easy item to find.

                            Sell the stock or hang on to it for the day you bump into an 1898 carbine needing one. The holes are a bummer but that's life.

                            Comment

                            • Sgt. Rob
                              Junior Member
                              • Mar 2013
                              • 15

                              #15
                              Just so everybody is clear, this is my 1896 carbine....................



                              This is my 1898 rifle.................................



                              and the stock in question is on this "donor parts" sporter


                              I think some of you are confused about which rifle is being restored with which parts. My goal is to end up with a "correct" 1896 restored carbine and 1898 restored rifle. The donor sporter will remain a sporter.

                              I hear what you gents are saying about the stock. It concerns me that one (well respected in the field) gentleman offered a trade for what would be a less valuable 1899 stock, then with drew because of the sling swivel holes. Which makes me think the damage is enough to devalue the stock to the point where maybe I should use it. I think a comparable 1896 stock would be worth less because of the numbers made, and I am worried that a fair trade may not be possible. I will see what happens when I offer it up in the classifieds, but do not have my hopes up because Mr. Hosmer would know the values and I feel his withdrawled offer carries weight.

                              Semper Fi, Rob

                              Comment

                              Working...