Serial Number / model year ???

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Brad
    Senior Member
    • Oct 2009
    • 518

    #1

    Serial Number / model year ???

    Howdy friends,
    Just had a person contact me regarding a Krag they want to sell. I have no idea where they got my name or e-mail but what they have seems interesting though they dont say carbine or rifle.
    In trying to help them figure out what they have I checked the serial number in my POYER book.
    They said its a model 1896, serial number 16025N ??
    My book says that is a model 1894??
    Also, dont know what the "N" means.
    Any help would be appreciated???
    Thanks
  • madsenshooter
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2009
    • 1476

    #2
    My guess is that the N isn't an N. Unless it's a 94 that someone added the N to, and that's not easy after the receiver is hardened. If it's something other than an N, it ought to be a model 98.
    Last edited by madsenshooter; 08-31-2015, 04:51.
    "I have sworn upon the Altar of God, eternity hostility upon all forms of tyranny over the minds of man." - Thomas Jefferson

    Comment

    • psteinmayer
      Senior Member
      • Sep 2011
      • 1527

      #3
      Any chance we could see a picture of the receiver showing the markings (Model and Serial)? Also some pictures of the entire Krag would be helpful in making a determination as to correctness and value.
      "I was home... What happened? What the Hell Happened?" - MM1 Jacob Holman, USS San Pablo

      Comment

      • Brad
        Senior Member
        • Oct 2009
        • 518

        #4
        I am trying to get a photo.
        As always, thanks for the help.
        Am I correct in that serial number is from 1894??
        Thanks

        Comment

        • butlersrangers
          Senior Member
          • May 2012
          • 533

          #5
          Brad: Your post throws a curve at everyone because there is No Letter in U.S. Krag serial numbers.

          Comment

          • Rick the Librarian
            Super Moderator
            • Aug 2009
            • 6700

            #6
            16025 started out as a Model 1892 rifle

            If the "N" is a number (like "X") the rifle is a Model 1898 rifle.

            Simple as that ...
            "We make men without chests and expect from them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst."
            --C.S. Lewis

            Comment

            • Dick Hosmer
              Very Senior Member - OFC
              • Aug 2009
              • 5993

              #7
              Brad - this is getting silly about the number(s) - there is another way to solve the "mystery".

              Look at the receiver, and stock, around the root of the bolt. Is there a flared bevel in the wood and a "U" shaped ring of metal at the bottom of the cutout, or does the bolt simply sit in a square notch?

              Comment

              • Brad
                Senior Member
                • Oct 2009
                • 518

                #8
                Thanks guys for all the input.
                My delema is now that my, in aparently all of yours interest is arroused. The person that e-mailed me "out of the blue" wont return my messages??
                I had mentioned to them that if altered "cut-off" any value is probably greatly effected.
                Well, I havnt heard back. Must have been the case.
                But thanks all.
                PS, I am still looking for a decent "REAL" carbine if anyone kows where I might find something.
                Not real sure just what I can afford right now. But I changed my focus to all Springfields and I do not yet have a Krag Carbine.
                Got a great rifle 762 S/N. Would that be a 92??

                Comment

                • Dick Hosmer
                  Very Senior Member - OFC
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 5993

                  #9
                  Yes, #762 would be a very early M1892 rifle. Is it unaltered, or has it been brought up to M1896 spec - most were.

                  Comment

                  • butlersrangers
                    Senior Member
                    • May 2012
                    • 533

                    #10
                    'Brad' - The unsolicited e-mail must have been about one of those Nigerian Krags. That is what the "N" stood for!
                    Last edited by butlersrangers; 09-02-2015, 08:21.

                    Comment

                    • Rick the Librarian
                      Super Moderator
                      • Aug 2009
                      • 6700

                      #11
                      Originally posted by butlersrangers
                      'Brad' - The unsolicited e-mail must have been about one of those Nigerian Krags. That is what the "N" stood for!
                      LOL!!
                      "We make men without chests and expect from them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst."
                      --C.S. Lewis

                      Comment

                      • Jackrabbitslim
                        Member
                        • Aug 2015
                        • 53

                        #12
                        Originally posted by butlersrangers
                        'Brad' - The unsolicited e-mail must have been about one of those Nigerian Krags. That is what the "N" stood for!
                        Just spewed Bombay out my nose! Funniest thing I've heard all day. Thanks!
                        "The men the American Public admire most extravagantly are the most daring liars; the men they detest most violently are those who tell them the truth." HL Mencken

                        Comment

                        • Brad
                          Senior Member
                          • Oct 2009
                          • 518

                          #13
                          Hey, you might have something there about that Nigerian Krag!!
                          That's a good one.

                          As for my #762, I believe it is in 1892 configuration. Its been awhile now since I made myself familiar with the Krag information, but I think thats the case.
                          It is though otherwise, unaltered having the full length stock and barrel, complete.
                          I will see if I have already taken any photos of it and will try and send out on this site. If I cant do that I can e-mail direct to anyone interested.
                          I think I have a photo of my Springfields attached, which includes the Krag.
                          All the guns there are either actual Springfields or of Springfield design.
                          The M1A is of course not an actual Springfield MAss gun.
                          The early 1770's French Musket is the gun I believe that the first Springfields were design from?
                          The rest are all Springfields except for the post war HRA Garand
                          100_1025.jpg

                          Comment

                          • sdkrag
                            Senior Member
                            • Sep 2009
                            • 426

                            #14
                            I looks like your Krag is an 1892 model updated to 1896 specs. original 1892 rifles have a cleaning rod below the barrel. Just a not, there are no 1894 models. Just 1892s marked with 1894.

                            Comment

                            • Dick Hosmer
                              Very Senior Member - OFC
                              • Aug 2009
                              • 5993

                              #15
                              M1892 Rifle OA.jpgThis is an unaltered 1892. Note thin wrist, one-piece cleaning rod, short handguard, no hold-open pin on extractor, full bolt rib, flat buttplate, etc.
                              Last edited by Dick Hosmer; 09-05-2015, 08:37.

                              Comment

                              Working...