What is the significance of The bowed RLB, and the spaced, unboxed R L B on Remington stocks? Did one come first? If so which......Thankyou in advance....
RLB or R L B......?
Collapse
X
-
I believe JB said that the boxed and unboxed RLB were close but I know the "spread" RLB (R L B) came last."We make men without chests and expect from them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst."
--C.S. LewisComment
-
The order of appearance was:
(1) Boxed RLB
(2) Unboxed spread R L B
(3) Unboxed RLB
Overlap exists.
J.B.Comment
-
Interesting ...in my (admitted unscientific) observation of mid-ranged Remington M1903s, I usually see "spread" RLB stamps on later rifles than the other two."We make men without chests and expect from them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst."
--C.S. LewisComment
-
-
I'd say a "spread" RLB."We make men without chests and expect from them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst."
--C.S. LewisComment
-
FWIW, My Remington 1903 has an unboxed "RLB" that is neatly stamped, aligned, and closely spaced. Serial # is 3185260 and barrel date of 7-42. Beard says "overlap" exists which sounds likely. Maybe Remington had more than one worker using the RLB stamps ( pure conjecture on my part).Comment
-
And another - SN 3223808 9-42 Unboxed RLB I suppose this would be considered an overlap into FJA territory as far as the stock goes, but I've had it for a long time - 1963. I've seen one or two other 10-42 RLB, but couldn't say if they were original.Comment
-
Usually, I thought FJA came in about 3,200,000 but with all the other "abnormalities" existing within Remington M1903s, I would be surprised a bit.
As I recall, Frank J. Atwood took over from Roy L. Bowlin about July, 1942, but, like with other markings there was certainly a time of "overlap."We make men without chests and expect from them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst."
--C.S. LewisComment
-
Comment

Comment