3 digit serial# 03

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Randy
    Member
    • Dec 2016
    • 87

    #1

    3 digit serial# 03

    Was just checking out GunBroker. com There's a 3 digit 03 on there. Guy wants 4 grand for it
  • stripper clip
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2009
    • 117

    #2
    Yikes! I hope it's still in .30-03 and in original and correct configuration for that asking price.

    Comment

    • Randy
      Member
      • Dec 2016
      • 87

      #3
      For that price it should be NOS and unfired

      Comment

      • steelap
        Senior Member
        • Jan 2010
        • 190

        #4
        Post a link? I couldn't find it.

        Thanks!

        Comment

        • Dan Shapiro
          Senior Member
          • Aug 2009
          • 5864

          #5
          Link:

          http://www.gunbroker.com/item/622073597
          "No man's life, liberty, or property is safe, while Congress is in session." Mark Twain

          Comment

          • Randy
            Member
            • Dec 2016
            • 87

            #6
            Originally posted by Dan Shapiro
            Thank you Dan

            Comment

            • clintonhater
              Senior Member
              • Nov 2015
              • 5220

              #7
              Two things I admire about this seller, even if his price is off-base: admits that stock is a replacement, and tells everyone up front what he wants for it, reasonable or not, rather than wasting everyone's time with those stupid, sucker-bait, "penny starts."

              If I had $4000 to spend on anything, what I'd buy would be a "new" second-hand truck.

              Comment

              • Sunray
                Senior Member
                • Sep 2009
                • 3251

                #8
                "...hope it's still in .30-03..." Fake if it is. The rifles were converted to .30-06 after 1906. Be worth more than 4 grand if it was one of the alleged 50 to 100 '03's that didn't get converted though. Mind you, the guy says it's not original. He put on the stock.
                Suspicious, anyway. JFC(J.F. Coyle) worked at SA from 1906-1907. That S/N indicates a 1903 manufacture date according to. http://m1903.com/
                Spelling and grammar count!

                Comment

                • Ironlip
                  Senior Member
                  • Dec 2009
                  • 309

                  #9
                  Would have preferred a cleaner shot of the receiver at point of the serial number. The blue seems almost too even, rather than more mottled in appearance as I think it should be if it's original finish. With the 05 date the barrel probably is a replacement. I think that serial number should have been assembled into a rod bayonet rifle in 1904.

                  Comment

                  • ElWoodman
                    Member
                    • Jun 2014
                    • 85

                    #10
                    Like that the guy was up front about the stock.......Would'a' liked it more if it was in a NO BOLT rod bayonet conversion stock (better still, original rod bayonet RIFLE). I'd need to see better photos, and still, at $4Gs, his price isn't the only thing that's high....My $.02

                    Comment

                    • Rick the Librarian
                      Super Moderator
                      • Aug 2009
                      • 6700

                      #11
                      J.F. Coyle worked at Springfield for considerably longer than 1906-07 (I know that is what Brophy says); his inspection stamps are seen on M1903s through the early 1930s.

                      The replacement stock (as upfront as the guy is) does reduce the value, I'd say in the $2000-2500 range IMHO.
                      "We make men without chests and expect from them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst."
                      --C.S. Lewis

                      Comment

                      • chuckindenver
                        Senior Member
                        • Sep 2009
                        • 3005

                        #12
                        i agree, 2500 is more realistic,
                        id like better pics of the rear sight as well, and the bolt.. i suspect both are replacments
                        if it aint broke...fix it till it finally is.

                        Comment

                        Working...