Mark I

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Rick the Librarian
    Super Moderator
    • Aug 2009
    • 6700

    #16
    Unfortunately, I cannot read most of the scans from the resources you offer. I am assuming from Jesse Harrison's book? If so, they are incorrect. If you check C.S. Ferris' "Rock Island Rifle Model of 1903", you'll see that Krack was placed in charge of small arms inspection at RIA in late 1941. Ferris researched Krack's career and he was not even employed in government service during at least part of the period mentioned in your scans. When he was, he had other duties.

    I stand by what I stated earlier.
    "We make men without chests and expect from them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst."
    --C.S. Lewis

    Comment

    • John Beard
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2009
      • 2275

      #17
      Originally posted by Kragrifle
      The only thing I am not sure about is the RIA stamp on the original WES cartouche. Usually means a rework of some kind but is not obvious as to what that might have entailed.
      I am skeptical that your rifle is fitted with an original Mark I stock. And the RIA/FK inspection stamp reinforces my skepticism. Nevertheless, you have a splendid Mark I rifle!

      J.B.

      Comment

      • Kragrifle
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2010
        • 1161

        #18
        Hi John and Rick
        Interesting information about Frank Krack. The chart I was trying to show was from Brophy's book. As for the stock, I have another Mark I and have been looking for another for years. If you study the wood around the ejection port carefully you will see the chatter marks from where the cutter created the recess. This area can be cut with a file to look like the correct cut out but never to duplicate it. I am sure about the stock. The only question I had was the RIA over FK over stamp. I suppose Krack cleaned and repaired the rifle during his tenure.

        Comment

        • Kragrifle
          Senior Member
          • Nov 2010
          • 1161

          #19
          My information has WES inspecting in the 1918-1920 time period so if correct this would fit with the Mark I barrel dates of 1919 and 1920.

          Comment

          • Rick the Librarian
            Super Moderator
            • Aug 2009
            • 6700

            #20
            Although Brophy is still seen as the "yardstick" book in many cases, keep in mind it has been over 30 years since his book was written and some of the information has proven to be incorrect or obsolete.

            W.E. Strong (WES) also inspected during an earlier period. I have a 78180 numbered M1903, original in every way, that has WES and I have seen a few other early M1903s with his inspection stamp, as well. Although I would defer to John in this (as in most others) matter, I would agree a WES is probably correct for a Mark I.
            "We make men without chests and expect from them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst."
            --C.S. Lewis

            Comment

            • John Beard
              Senior Member
              • Aug 2009
              • 2275

              #21
              Does your rifle's stock have a small "s" stamped on the fore end tip? Please oblige us with a picture.

              Thanks!

              J.B.

              Comment

              • Kragrifle
                Senior Member
                • Nov 2010
                • 1161

                #22
                Nothing on fore end tip

                Comment

                • Kragrifle
                  Senior Member
                  • Nov 2010
                  • 1161

                  #23
                  IMG_4296.jpg

                  Comment

                  • John Beard
                    Senior Member
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 2275

                    #24
                    Thanks for the picture!

                    J.B.

                    Comment

                    • Kragrifle
                      Senior Member
                      • Nov 2010
                      • 1161

                      #25
                      John
                      Would appreciate your thoughts.

                      Comment

                      • jerrbear
                        Senior Member
                        • Sep 2009
                        • 121

                        #26
                        Is the tip on a Mark I stock supposed to marked on the tip in some way?

                        Comment

                        • John Beard
                          Senior Member
                          • Aug 2009
                          • 2275

                          #27
                          Originally posted by jerrbear
                          Is the tip on a Mark I stock supposed to marked on the tip in some way?
                          No.

                          J.B.

                          Comment

                          • John Beard
                            Senior Member
                            • Aug 2009
                            • 2275

                            #28
                            Originally posted by Kragrifle
                            John
                            Would appreciate your thoughts.
                            Your rifle's stock exhibits a number of characteristics which are not common with Mark I stocks. I am unable to identify your stock and, therefore, cannot conclusively question its authenticity.

                            J.B.

                            Comment

                            Working...