Possible USMC

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • LAH
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2011
    • 238

    #1

    Possible USMC

    sn 1025654, 12-27 SA barrel, stippled BP, hatcher hole.

    anything?

    pix042223126.jpg
    pix941311560.jpg
    pix474676927.jpg
    1903.JPG
    Last edited by LAH; 01-12-2018, 03:50.
  • bruce
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 3759

    #2
    You know what they say. IF it looks ... waddles ... quacks ... like a duck. This rifle sure looks like a duck! JMHO. Sincerely. bruce.
    " Unlike most conservatives, libs have no problem exploiting dead children and dancing on their graves."

    Comment

    • 98src
      Senior Member
      • Oct 2017
      • 199

      #3
      1025145 101043USS BREESE (DM18) TO EPIC 73
      1025209 031632USMC
      1025314 041239USMCR - SEATTLE
      1025460 050731USMC
      1025540 011237USMC - QUANTICO (SURVEY)
      Looks like it is in good company
      1025552 08/20/31 USMC
      1025555 05/04/23 16 5TH INF NY NG
      1025556 07/30/31 USMC - PARRIS ISLAND
      1025729 10/05/29 USMC - HAMPTON ROADS (SURVEYED)
      1025819 10/10/43 USS BREESE (DM18) TO EPIC 73
      1025903 06/11/31 USMC
      Last edited by 98src; 01-12-2018, 11:43.

      Comment

      • John Beard
        Senior Member
        • Aug 2009
        • 2275

        #4
        Looks like a USMC rifle to me.

        Congratulations! And thanks for sharing.

        J.B.

        Comment

        • Richard H Brown Jr
          Senior Member
          • Jan 2010
          • 445

          #5
          98src:

          Did a little goohoo-ing, and the 2 rifles transferred from USS Breese to Epic 73, *MIGHT* have been transferred to a US Navy depot or unit at Noumea, New Caledonia, as the code name for the Noumea area is listed as EPIC as mentioned in a these entitled The Construction of Airfields during the New Georia Campaign of 1943-44: Lessons Learned by the United States Naval Construction Battalions by Joseph C. Zimmerman page 34 "A response to the 47th from the Bureau of Yards and Docks addresses this issue advising that 'spare parts have been and are being shipped to the spare parts depots located at EPIC (Noumea, New Caledonia) and EBON (Espiritu Santo, New Hebrides), in large quantities.' "

          Hope this helps.

          R Brown

          Comment

          • Kaliman
            Member
            • May 2015
            • 63

            #6
            Isn't this rifle on gunbroker right now ?

            Comment

            • Allen
              Moderator
              • Sep 2009
              • 10627

              #7
              Originally posted by bruce
              You know what they say. IF it looks ... waddles ... quacks ... like a duck. This rifle sure looks like a duck! JMHO. Sincerely. bruce.
              Quack
              Attached Files

              Comment

              • cplnorton
                Senior Member
                • Sep 2009
                • 2194

                #8
                I would be curious if this rifle has vise marks on the barrel. That barrel date is about the changeover when they stopped getting barreled receivers from the Army and started to get loose barrels.

                So I would be curious if this did have vise marks.

                Comment

                • Kaliman
                  Member
                  • May 2015
                  • 63

                  #9
                  For what it's worth, neither of my 1.02 with 2$ or 28 barrels have vice marks.

                  I'm thinking more and more the vice marks were only present on rifle barrels that were replaced in the 40s.

                  Comment

                  • cplnorton
                    Senior Member
                    • Sep 2009
                    • 2194

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Kaliman
                    For what it's worth, neither of my 1.02 with 2$ or 28 barrels have vice marks.

                    I'm thinking more and more the vice marks were only present on rifle barrels that were replaced in the 40s.
                    Yeah that is the only trait never mentioned in the docs. I would love to know when it started.

                    Comment

                    • Richard H Brown Jr
                      Senior Member
                      • Jan 2010
                      • 445

                      #11
                      cplnorton:

                      You should know that the Marines won't spend good cash on *nice to have* tools, when *good enough* works.

                      R Brown

                      Comment

                      • LAH
                        Senior Member
                        • Aug 2011
                        • 238

                        #12
                        The barrel does not have the "vise" marks. The 12-27 SA barrel just has a large P adjacent to the sight base and
                        the number 2 and couple of short straight marks, / or 1 ??

                        The stock marks are a large B on the top butt end, the number 17 just behind the trigger guard, and a large RI
                        on the fore end of the stock. Don't see the usual P or JFC, etc. either sanded off or never there.

                        The bolt has a R1 on top of the handle. No serial number on the bolt.

                        Hatcher hole in the receiver matches up perfectly with the large hole in the bolt.

                        pix674126424.jpgpix141302504.jpg20180129_210336 (002).jpg

                        p.s. Emri...Geese and Ducks flying over the house every day calling our name.....
                        Last edited by LAH; 01-29-2018, 06:33.

                        Comment

                        • LAH
                          Senior Member
                          • Aug 2011
                          • 238

                          #13
                          The 12-27 SA barrel measures about 1.5 or so both ends.

                          Comment

                          • LAH
                            Senior Member
                            • Aug 2011
                            • 238

                            #14
                            Originally posted by John Beard
                            Looks like a USMC rifle to me.

                            Congratulations! And thanks for sharing.

                            J.B.
                            John

                            Does the R1 bolt, RI stock, lack of Proof stamps, indicate
                            maybe an early WWII rebuild? Bore looks nice and bright
                            and near new throat and muzzle measurements.

                            Thanks

                            Loy

                            Comment

                            • John Beard
                              Senior Member
                              • Aug 2009
                              • 2275

                              #15
                              Originally posted by LAH
                              John

                              Does the R1 bolt, RI stock, lack of Proof stamps, indicate
                              maybe an early WWII rebuild? Bore looks nice and bright
                              and near new throat and muzzle measurements.

                              Thanks

                              Loy
                              The rifle was definitely overhauled immediately before or during WWII. The R 1 bolt is probably a Bubba-installed replacement.

                              J.B.

                              Comment

                              Working...