Marines in the Making, with their 1903's

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • RED
    Very Senior Member - OFC
    • Aug 2009
    • 11689

    #16
    As for the 06 round. That's preposterous.
    Spot on!

    Wow! I also find it hard to believe there are USMC ranges that will not allow 30-06 rounds but do allow 7.62 NATO. The difference between the WWII round and the Vietnam era 7.62 Nato round:

    The WWII round adopted in 1936 fired a 147 gr. bullet at 2,805 FPS and the 1960's 7.62X51 Nato fired a 147 gr. projectile at 2733 FPS...
    The difference is 5 grs of bullet weight and 62 FPS. Yep, that's all and that makes the '06 decidedly more dangerous at 500 yards?

    I went to Naval Aviation Officer Candidate School in 1966 and all the DI's were USMC. I flew with USMC pilots the RAG and again as a instructor in the RIO school... and I still have the utmost respect for those guys. I cannot believe the USMC of today is anything other than the best.

    My good friend (deceased now) USMC Cap't. Joe Rowland is almost a legend for his reply to the USN 0-6 Captain when we were put on report for being "uncovered,", on the tarmac.

    He said: "Sir, yes sir, thank you sir, a letter of reprimand is better than no mail at all."

    Six months later, Joe was a airline pilot for Trans Texas.

    Comment

    Working...