Marine low number receivers

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • pickax
    Senior Member
    • May 2011
    • 113

    #16
    Originally posted by Cosine26
    Hi pickax
    An interesting article by “slamfire” that you sent.
    The one I was interested in was published as:
    LN Receiver Steel
    08-07-2025, 06:47 #24
    I searched the 3 biggest forums under the title you listed and found nothing. I suspect it was here on CSP, but may be a disconnect from the old Jouster.
    Regardless, I've learned the alloy receivers were, and are superior to the carbon SHT and DHT. versions, and why so.
    Also, digging through old threads reminded me of nuggets from the old salts I had forgotten through the last few years.
    Time to read Major Culvers notes again too.
    Thanks for the info to all you old salts, it is appreciated.

    Comment

    • Cosine26
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2009
      • 737

      #17
      pickax
      Try this ur
      http://www.jouster2.com/forums/showt...hinking)/page7

      Comment

      • lyman
        Administrator - OFC
        • Aug 2009
        • 11269

        #18
        Originally posted by Cosine26
        thank you for reposting that thread,

        I've skimmed thru it and now need to go back and read every post,,

        here is some more info,, recently come to light

        I am reading Canfield (Pg61) let me quote as best I can type. Because of the inherent danger, the older single heat treated receivers were ordered to be withdrawn from service and scrapped, but budgetary and logistical considerations resulted in many remaining in use .... This implies that...

        Comment

        Working...