Help

[dave]

I believe your statement to be incorrect with respect to the '03A1 and '03A4.

Yeh, any rifle with a pistol grip stock became an A1, no matter when stock was put on, They were not marked A1 (same with A4's but scope and marking moved to side?)

[rebound]

John, still need an explanation for the 03 you have that is marked as an A1 ??

[Crashyoung]

My 1903 Springfield did not have an A1, but it did have 'Mark I' under the model.
My RIA has 1903, with no A1 after the model.
It seems to be many different ways to mark a receiver.
[IMG][/IMG]
SOME of the markings are fraudulent, especially on high dollar rifles.
I have seen receivers remarked with a pantograph on occasion, but
the markings of a rolled vs. pantograph are very obvious, if you know
the difference between them.
Other rifles have the receiver mutilated in an effort to disguise the rifle.
So, to state, this is the way, or that is the way, isn't cast in steel , but
it is a good starting point, especially between the older and newer rifles.

It is best to ask questions and post pictures, if there is any questions
about the rifle. There are many VERY knowledgeable people out there!
And I thank them all for answering my ignorant questions, THANKS PEOPLE!

[Garden Valley]

You got it in one!

I believe that is the most brief reply I have ever seen you post. Thus far you have merely latched on to a bone that was thrown your way. I would still like to see photos of your '03A1 and '03A4. Are we hoping for too much?

[Crashyoung]

To the mother of a Marine, Thank you and your son for his and your contribution to our country.

As to your rifle. There are three things we need to know for a fair assessment. The receiver make,
model, and serial number. The bolt should have markings to help determine the date of manufacture
as well as the handle configuration. The last thing is the barrel make and date, which is near the front sight.

Pictures of these markings also would help. If you can give us the information and pictures, we may be able
to give you a good idea about the rifle.

[rebound]

I believe that is the most brief reply I have ever seen you post. Thus far you have merely latched on to a bone that was thrown your way. I would still like to see photos of your '03A1 and '03A4. Are we hoping for too much?

Don't hold your breath.........

[jgaynor]

Springfield..jpg

The markings on early '03A4 rifles were partially obscured by the scope mount base, but they were shortly relocated to clear the scope mount, and they were still marked '03A3.

This is incorrect. All production A4's were made with the nomenclature (MODEL 03-A3) moved to the side to clear the scope base. At least one A4 prototype was assembled on an 03-A1. Note it used side mount for scope and took full advantage of the Weaver's eye relief.
Regards,
Jim

[bombdog]

Wow, you guys can really hijack a post. To the original post, ma'am, thank you for your son's service and thank you for being a marine mom.
bombdog, out!

I believe that is the most brief reply I have ever seen you post. Thus far you have merely latched on to a bone that was thrown your way. I would still like to see photos of your '03A1 and '03A4. Are we hoping for too much?

[Crashyoung]

I bet it scared Mom off...