Pre-WW1 M1903 Eye Candy

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Chuck Russell
    Member
    • Dec 2009
    • 76

    #1

    Pre-WW1 M1903 Eye Candy

    Great pictures of a beautiful rifle. Wish it was mine. http://www.gunauction.com/buy/127013...t-bore.c-and-r
  • chuckindenver
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 3005

    #2
    ill go on a limb...been a while for me,..
    front band is backwards... bayonet lug is wrong, rear sight is wrong. buttplate is wrong. trigger guard is wrong.
    front sight is wrong..
    other then that , its nice....
    i could be mistaken on some of that assesment..
    but shouldnt the bayonet lug be the early type with no split at the stacking swivle?
    shouldnt the front sight have the pin at the front?
    shouldnt the rear sight have a file edge on the left side, and a wider adjustment slide for the spring and detent?
    shouldnt the trigger guard have the long hole, and not be modified with the pin?
    shouldnt that have a early numbered buttplate with smaller trapdoor??
    shouldnt the stamp be script type?
    hmmmmm?
    its purdy though...not sure why he posted the TE and MW...your not gonna shoot it anyway..
    Last edited by chuckindenver; 03-25-2014, 04:15.
    if it aint broke...fix it till it finally is.

    Comment

    • Rick the Librarian
      Super Moderator
      • Aug 2009
      • 6700

      #3
      A real beaut!
      "We make men without chests and expect from them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst."
      --C.S. Lewis

      Comment

      • chuckindenver
        Senior Member
        • Sep 2009
        • 3005

        #4
        Rick? was i close on my assesment or way off base?? been lookin at parts guns so long its hard to say anymore...
        if it aint broke...fix it till it finally is.

        Comment

        • Fred
          Senior Member
          • Sep 2009
          • 4977

          #5
          I want it. Yea, so Rick, what are your thoughts on this rifle?
          Last edited by Fred; 03-25-2014, 04:49.

          Comment

          • Chuck Russell
            Member
            • Dec 2009
            • 76

            #6
            Rick's comments would be appreciated. John Beard's comments would be golden. One of the reasons I put together the M1903 data on what I thought were substantially original rifles was to be able to compare parts, barrel dates, receivers, styles of letters and numerals, etc, etc

            Comment

            • John Beard
              Senior Member
              • Aug 2009
              • 2275

              #7
              Chuck,

              The lower band is installed backwards and the split-shank swivel is questionable. But everything else looks correct.

              J.B.

              Comment

              • Rick the Librarian
                Super Moderator
                • Aug 2009
                • 6700

                #8
                I need to take a closer look, especially with Chuck's comments. It wouldn't be the first time I've thought a sow's ear was a silk purse!
                "We make men without chests and expect from them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst."
                --C.S. Lewis

                Comment

                • Rick the Librarian
                  Super Moderator
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 6700

                  #9
                  Assuming the one-bolt stock was installed in the 1908-1909 period, I think some of the modifications could have been made, like the upper band, lower band swivel, buttplate, etc.
                  "We make men without chests and expect from them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst."
                  --C.S. Lewis

                  Comment

                  • chuckindenver
                    Senior Member
                    • Sep 2009
                    • 3005

                    #10
                    when did they switch from the 1905 sights?? notice the front has the retaining pin in the back.
                    all the 1905 sights iv seen or had , pin was in the front...
                    the only 1905 rear sight iv seen was one i had, it had a file like edge on the left side of the ladder, and no stop bar to keep the adjust slide from coming off..
                    figured the JFC would match the script P as well.
                    if it aint broke...fix it till it finally is.

                    Comment

                    • John Beard
                      Senior Member
                      • Aug 2009
                      • 2275

                      #11
                      If you look closely, you will see that the rifle is fitted with an altered rod bayonet barrel and the front sight is pinned at the front.

                      The rifle's receiver was manufactured in 1907, well after the .30-'06 cartridge was adopted. The rifle, therefore, was never fitted with a 1905 rear sight.

                      The rifle was assembled in 1908 using mostly leftover parts drawn from Ordnance Stores at Springfield Armory. One must remember that Springfield Armory accumulated in Ordnance Stores very large quantities of unassembled parts, including loose barrels and receivers, during 1905 and again during 1906-07. And those parts had to eventually get assembled into complete rifles.

                      J.B.

                      Comment

                      • chuckindenver
                        Senior Member
                        • Sep 2009
                        • 3005

                        #12
                        after i saved and blew the picture up, i can see the ghost for the pin in front..
                        like i said, iv been looking at so many parts guns over the last few years of gunsmithing....hard to say on a nice rifle anymore..
                        if it aint broke...fix it till it finally is.

                        Comment

                        • 03Rifleman
                          Member
                          • Sep 2009
                          • 35

                          #13
                          Correct me if I'm wrong but it's been my understanding that the upper bbl band had been improved with a steel hardening process beginning sometime in 1910 and was therefore marked with the "H" to identify this process. This rifle appears to have this type of upper bbl band. Good pictures but personally, I would like to see a picture of the sighting index staking of the front sight to the stud on the bbl to see if it's original.

                          Comment

                          • John Beard
                            Senior Member
                            • Aug 2009
                            • 2275

                            #14
                            Originally posted by 03Rifleman
                            Correct me if I'm wrong but it's been my understanding that the upper bbl band had been improved with a steel hardening process beginning sometime in 1910 and was therefore marked with the "H" to identify this process. This rifle appears to have this type of upper bbl band. Good pictures but personally, I would like to see a picture of the sighting index staking of the front sight to the stud on the bbl to see if it's original.
                            The upper band bayonet lug is not conclusively marked with an "H". In addition, I am not aware of documentation affixing the precise date for implementation of bayonet lug hardening.

                            J.B.

                            Comment

                            • RCS
                              Senior Member
                              • Aug 2009
                              • 2180

                              #15
                              front sight

                              sequence of front sights: left is the rod bayonet, middle is the altered barrel with the pin in front and far left is the standard.

                              My SA s/n 160963 has a SA 2-07 bbl and the no bolt stock has a non serif P in circle
                              Attached Files

                              Comment

                              Working...