1903 USMC Service Rifle under the radar.... Picture heavy

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mike D
    Senior Member
    • Jun 2010
    • 1031

    #16
    Your rifle, do what you want.

    The buttplate does not affect me, but what appears to be varnish on the stock, sure does. I don't believe the USMC did that. A previous owner did not bother to remove the hardware before applying this, it seems.

    I'm wondering about the stock. It is a Rem M1903 stock, correct? No relief for an A3 handguard ring, right? Looking at the cut-off relief and stock bolts, it does not appear to be sanded at all. Could it be NOS??

    More questions after answers. Thanks!

    Mike

    Comment

    • Normanclature
      Junior Member
      • Sep 2009
      • 14

      #17
      If Mike D is correct and it is a Remington stock, then the "correct" buttplate for the stock would be a milled or stamped Remington. So the stock on this rifle is a replacement and any 03 buttplate could have been added by the Marines from spares.
      It seems to me that under these circumstances it is merely a matter of personal preference for the present owner to put a stippled buttplate on his rifle. I cannot see how this is destroying the rifles history or misleading future buyers.
      We know stippled buttplates were used by the USMC. Checkered ones were probably used also.

      Comment

      • John Beard
        Senior Member
        • Aug 2009
        • 2275

        #18
        Originally posted by Mike D
        Your rifle, do what you want.

        The buttplate does not affect me, but what appears to be varnish on the stock, sure does. I don't believe the USMC did that. A previous owner did not bother to remove the hardware before applying this, it seems.

        I'm wondering about the stock. It is a Rem M1903 stock, correct? No relief for an A3 handguard ring, right? Looking at the cut-off relief and stock bolts, it does not appear to be sanded at all. Could it be NOS??

        More questions after answers. Thanks!

        Mike
        (1) Incorrect.

        (2) Right.

        (3) No.

        J.B.
        Last edited by John Beard; 04-05-2015, 07:03.

        Comment

        • Mike D
          Senior Member
          • Jun 2010
          • 1031

          #19
          Originally posted by John Beard
          (1) Incorrect.

          (2) Right.

          (3) No.

          J.B.
          John - Thanks for the answers. If you could, please provide a little more info.

          If the stock has no finger-grooves and no A3 ring relief, what else could it be besides made for a Rem '03?

          Do you know of any sub-contractors that made this type of stock?

          Why not NOS? Would that not explain the wood fibers?

          Mike

          Comment

          • Punch the Clown
            Senior Member
            • Aug 2012
            • 172

            #20
            Originally posted by John Beard
            (1) Incorrect.

            (2) Right.

            (3) No.

            J.B.
            OK, I'll play. The stock is a Springfield scant stock that someone re-shaped to a straight grip? That's my guess and I'm sticking to it.

            Comment

            • Roadkingtrax
              Senior Member
              • Feb 2010
              • 7835

              #21
              Punch its not a scant stock. I had a similar Marine rifle, and it was in the style of a Remington straight stock, albeit...a little rougher cut.

              Last edited by Roadkingtrax; 04-09-2015, 06:26.
              "The first gun that was fired at Fort Sumter sounded the death-knell of slavery. They who fired it were the greatest practical abolitionists this nation has produced." ~BG D. Ullman

              Comment

              Working...