Tweet
HI, I recently bought a mix-master 03 I thought was a Bannerman, turns out to be a Sedgley . I plan to replace the die-cast and M1917 parts with correct pieces to have a wall hanger. I'm not trying to mis -represent the piece, I just want it to look right. Is there any collector interest in Sedgley military 03s as opposed to the sporters? Is there any valid reason not to restore this to original configuration? Thanks
-
-
Pics might really help in this situation. Before you change anything some of those Sedgley's are highly collectible by some. -
Original Sedgley sporters had no 1917 or die cast parts. They were 100% Springfield (except stock and barrel). So these parts were added later or it is not a Sedgley Some were low number and had the serial stippled over, you can usually make out the number. A new number was stamped in the striker channel. I have two, one rifle and a Mannlicher carbine which was stocked by Paul Yager (sp?) after he bought Sedgley's parts, when Sedgley went out of business.
What made you decide it is a Sedgley? I have a Sedgley catalog, #43, 16 pages I would be glad to copy and send to you. E-mail davcath55@gmail.com
He also made rifles on 1917 action, Mausers, and Win. 52, 22's. Many other products. They are very collectable and shoot-able!
PS: Just realize you are not asking about sporters, sorryLast edited by dave; 06-14-2015, 01:43.You can never go home again.Comment
-
Based on your description, your rifle is readily identifiable as a Sedgley Cadet Rifle and, as such, has a modicum of collector value. If you replace the Sedgley parts, you will have increased your investment in the rifle, destroyed its identity, and decreased it's value. Make wise choices!
Hope this helps.
J.B.Comment
Comment