Just comparing the two 03's in photo's

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Fred
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 4977

    #1

    Just comparing the two 03's in photo's

    Here are photos of my two 1903's together for some interesting comparison's with each other. Just for the heck of it.

    Attached Files
  • Fred
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 4977

    #2
    Attached Files

    Comment

    • Fred
      Senior Member
      • Sep 2009
      • 4977

      #3
      Attached Files

      Comment

      • Fred
        Senior Member
        • Sep 2009
        • 4977

        #4
        Attached Files

        Comment

        • WHG
          Senior Member
          • Sep 2009
          • 115

          #5
          Is one of the rear sights installed backwards? Both of my 1903 rifles (one made in 1918, the other 1935) have the adjusting knob at the front of the sight.

          Comment

          • 1mark
            Senior Member
            • Sep 2009
            • 390

            #6
            Nope both sights are install properly. Just different designs.
            "Three people can keep a secret as long as two of them are dead" Mark Twain

            Comment

            • Fred
              Senior Member
              • Sep 2009
              • 4977

              #7
              Attached Files

              Comment

              • Fred
                Senior Member
                • Sep 2009
                • 4977

                #8
                Attached Files

                Comment

                • clintonhater
                  Senior Member
                  • Nov 2015
                  • 5220

                  #9
                  Originally posted by 1mark
                  Nope both sights are install properly. Just different designs.
                  In one of his many magazine articles, Whelen said he thought the M1901 sight was the superior battle sight, but that the "target shooters" in Ordnance insisted on a peep--and then placed it too far forward to be effective!

                  In the film "Sergeant York" (I think it was that one), there's a close-up of a detachment of marching Doughboys, and the M1901 sights on their Springfields are very obvious. Makes me wonder if the War Dept. (which at the time cooperated very closely with Hollywood) gave them to the studio to avoid the cost of converting them to the M1905.
                  Last edited by clintonhater; 07-13-2016, 04:10.

                  Comment

                  • RCK
                    Senior Member
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 245

                    #10
                    Fred, thanks for showing those great rifles.

                    Comment

                    • Fred
                      Senior Member
                      • Sep 2009
                      • 4977

                      #11
                      It's my pleasure!

                      Comment

                      • Rick the Librarian
                        Super Moderator
                        • Aug 2009
                        • 6700

                        #12
                        Originally posted by clintonhater
                        In the film "Sergeant York" (I think it was that one), there's a close-up of a detachment of marching Doughboys, and the M1901 sights on their Springfields are very obvious. Makes me wonder if the War Dept. (which at the time cooperated very closely with Hollywood) gave them to the studio to avoid the cost of converting them to the M1905.
                        The rifles in the film were Bannerman 1903s made of 1903, M1917 and Krag parts. The sights were probably M1902 Krag sights.
                        "We make men without chests and expect from them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst."
                        --C.S. Lewis

                        Comment

                        • Allen Humphrey
                          Senior Member
                          • Jul 2010
                          • 606

                          #13
                          Thanks for showing those Fred. If you ever get the opportunity to accurately weigh the rod bayonet rifle, I'd love to hear the result. The earliest versions of the model incorporated so many weight reducing features that we subsequently deleted by the time Remington finished wit the 1903. It seems like there would be a substantial weight difference between a Rod Bayonet rifle compared to a late Rem 1903 and its long bayonet and scabbard.

                          Comment

                          • Fred
                            Senior Member
                            • Sep 2009
                            • 4977

                            #14
                            OK, I'll go weigh it now on the digital bathroom scales...


                            Model 1903 made in 1918...9.7 (with oiler and 1907 sling)

                            Model 1903 Rod Bayonet made in 1903...9.5 (with oiler full of oil and 1903 sling)

                            Model 1896 Krag made in 1896...9.5 (with oiler and three rods and 1903 sling)

                            Model 1868 Springfield made in 1868...9.8 (with 1887 sling)
                            Last edited by Fred; 07-14-2016, 09:48.

                            Comment

                            • Richard H Brown Jr
                              Senior Member
                              • Jan 2010
                              • 445

                              #15
                              The one in the front looks like a really low SN. Pre-War original to 1903-1908 or so. Any exact date range avail. from you experts?


                              RHB

                              Comment

                              Working...