It spoke to me

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • ElWoodman
    Member
    • Jun 2014
    • 85

    #1

    It spoke to me

    Well, they all do, but I bought another 03....Remington,8-42 RA barrel,Sn31699xx....It came in a dingy C stock with an inverted K (Keystone?) in the cutoff well and a most peculiar broad arrow on the foretip....Lend-Lease perhaps? Dark black finish, with a few bright blue parts. Bolt has a R underside of handle, and a squared off safety lug....Any info helpful.....
  • p246
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2013
    • 2216

    #2
    Pics really help the experts here.

    Comment

    • Merc
      Senior Member
      • Feb 2016
      • 1690

      #3
      Your Remington 03-A3 rifle was made early in WW2 and may have seen the kind of rough service that made extensive rebuilding necessary. It would be interesting to know the rifle's history.

      The S/N 31699xx indicates that it was originally assembled by Remington in 6-42 so it has a later Remington barrel if it is stamped RA 8-42.

      Mixed finishes on the mechanical parts probably means that they began life on other rifles. Remington stamped an R on their parts while SC left them blank.

      The C stock is a replacement. The K in the cutoff well could have been an inspectors mark. The broad arrow was the British acceptance mark. A photo of it would help to determine if that's what it really is. The US did make lend-lease rifles for the Brits, however they were made by Savage in the US and Longbranch in Canada and were the Enfield No. 4 Mk 1* that fired .303 caliber ammo.

      The SRS guys on this forum can tell you if there are any hits on the S/N that would trace the rifle's activities.

      Good luck,
      Merc

      Comment

      • Merc
        Senior Member
        • Feb 2016
        • 1690

        #4
        EI,

        The stamped symbol on the fore tip of the stock on my 03-A3 is the flaming bomb. It's very crisp but small making it difficult to see without a magnifying glass or eye loupe.

        The stock on my minty 03-A3 was also dingy when I bought it a few weeks for ago. I could see that it was in really good shape with minimal nicks, dings and scratches but the linseed oil finish had turned into a dark sticky coating. After I taped some metal parts and removed others to prevent scuffing, I removed the old linseed oil finish by rubbing the wood gently with 00 steel wool dipped in acetone. Once the old finish was removed, I used dry steel wool to gently polish the wood surfaces to a low luster that revealed the original color and wood grain. I thought about applying another coating of linseed oil but have decided to leave the stock the way it is. What a big difference. I should have taken before and after pics.

        Merc
        Last edited by Merc; 07-31-2016, 06:29.

        Comment

        • Punch the Clown
          Senior Member
          • Aug 2012
          • 172

          #5
          The inverted "K" is Keystone. The non-scalloped safety lug and an "R" stamp at the root of the handle was discussed here before. I had one show up on a purchase and was mystified. I think John said they were really late replacement bolts but I'm not sure. Pictures are always nice.

          Comment

          • pickax
            Senior Member
            • May 2011
            • 113

            #6
            The serial is too early for an 'A3. I'm seeing 7/42 production 1903 which makes the barrel correct.
            It might have some "modified' features. Pictures would tell the story.

            Comment

            • Rick the Librarian
              Super Moderator
              • Aug 2009
              • 6700

              #7
              I agree - a correct barrel. The bolt, if described correctly, is a replacement. The serial number is too late for a British Land/lease (Sales) rifle.
              "We make men without chests and expect from them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst."
              --C.S. Lewis

              Comment

              • pickax
                Senior Member
                • May 2011
                • 113

                #8
                Mr. Woodman, A nice Remington in a C stock speaks to me as well. The later square lug A3 bolt is fine too!

                Comment

                • Merc
                  Senior Member
                  • Feb 2016
                  • 1690

                  #9
                  A3 S/N vs 03 S/N

                  Originally posted by pickax
                  The serial is too early for an 'A3. I'm seeing 7/42 production 1903 which makes the barrel correct.
                  It might have some "modified' features. Pictures would tell the story.
                  Now I'm confused. According to www.vishooter.net/ra_serialization.txt the serial numbers beginning with 3,000,000 were assigned to A3s. Was this during the period before the term A3 was used? 7-42 is correct, my error on 6-42.
                  Last edited by Merc; 07-31-2016, 05:57.

                  Comment

                  • Johnny P
                    Senior Member
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 6269

                    #10
                    There was an overlap in production of the 1903 at they transitioned into 03-A3 production. You will find some late 1903 Remingtons that show where the boss for the 03-A3 sight was milled off. From memory the 1903 production went into the 3.3 million range, but don't remember closer than that.

                    Comment

                    • blackhawknj
                      Senior Member
                      • Aug 2011
                      • 3754

                      #11
                      Uncle Sam's Ordnance men were more concerned with getting a rifle back in operation than in keeping it "correct." I have a 1918 made M1903 with the "scant grip" stock. Not correct for 1918, correct for WWII.

                      Comment

                      • Darreld Walton
                        Senior Member
                        • Sep 2009
                        • 632

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Merc
                        Now I'm confused. According to www.vishooter.net/ra_serialization.txt the serial numbers beginning with 3,000,000 were assigned to A3s. Was this during the period before the term A3 was used? 7-42 is correct, my error on 6-42.
                        Must be some confusion somewhere. Remington M1903 s/n's start at 3 million. I own Rem. 1903 s/n 3,002,XXX, unfortunately sporterized, but with all of the very early features present. Some of the other fella's would have a lot better idea of where the Rem. A3's serial numbers started.

                        Comment

                        • pickax
                          Senior Member
                          • May 2011
                          • 113

                          #13
                          Yes, the serialization charts are a bit confusing as they list both together. However the serial/barrel charts just below them separate the rifles by model/manufacturer a bit more definitively.
                          So although in constant transition, The A3 starts in the 33K range around 12/42.
                          I'm really grateful for the VI shooter site, it's mighty handy. Thanks JB and all contributors.

                          Comment

                          • Rick the Librarian
                            Super Moderator
                            • Aug 2009
                            • 6700

                            #14
                            Remington M1903s start in the 3,000,000 range. The first M1903A3s appear in the 3,320,000 range and they both are serialed from there until about the 3,360,000 range (although a few M1903s appear in the 3,370,000-3,380,000 range. After that, all M1903A3.
                            "We make men without chests and expect from them virtue and enterprise. We laugh at honor and are shocked to find traitors in our midst."
                            --C.S. Lewis

                            Comment

                            Working...