1949 sleeping bag

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Barryeye
    Senior Member
    • Dec 2009
    • 566

    #1

    1949 sleeping bag

    Gentleman. Having bit of a clear out. Found my old sleeping bag. It is a U.S. military down filled bag. I assume from the label Korean War vintage. I think they were referred to as Mummy bags. As a Cub Scout leader I used this bag for years with no complaints. It is in good condition with just a few well done repairs. My camping days are over and frankly it was far too warm for a New Zealand summer but perfect for winter. Problem is what do I do with this 60 year old bag? I can’t display it with my military rifles, knives and bayonets but it is a part of history.
    Do people collect such items? Are these bags common? Still a lot of life left in it but modern bags are better and lighter.
    ‘
    Attached Files
    Is it not better to place a question mark upon a problem while seeking an answer than to put the label `God` there and consider the matter closed? Joseph Lewis
  • m1ashooter
    Senior Member
    • May 2011
    • 3220

    #2
    You bet people collect them. Check this forum out. If its USGI its collected by someone.

    http://www.usmilitariaforum.com
    To Error Is Human To Forgive Is Not SAC Policy

    Comment

    • Barryeye
      Senior Member
      • Dec 2009
      • 566

      #3
      Thanks M1ashooter. I'll do that but I've got a feeling that there will be a lot more of those bags out there then collectors. Also remember I am in New Zealand.
      Is it not better to place a question mark upon a problem while seeking an answer than to put the label `God` there and consider the matter closed? Joseph Lewis

      Comment

      • snakehunter
        Senior Member
        • Sep 2009
        • 773

        #4
        Originally posted by Barryeye
        Gentleman. Having bit of a clear out. Found my old sleeping bag. It is a U.S. military down filled bag. I assume from the label Korean War vintage. I think they were referred to as Mummy bags. As a Cub Scout leader I used this bag for years with no complaints. It is in good condition with just a few well done repairs. My camping days are over and frankly it was far too warm for a New Zealand summer but perfect for winter. Problem is what do I do with this 60 year old bag? I can’t display it with my military rifles, knives and bayonets but it is a part of history.
        Do people collect such items? Are these bags common? Still a lot of life left in it but modern bags are better and lighter.
        I have one and use it.

        Comment

        • Maury Krupp
          Senior Member
          • Aug 2009
          • 824

          #5
          I doubt your bag is 60 years old.

          The "M-1949" is just the year the design was adopted. The bags were made through the 1960s or '70s at least.

          Filled with a mix of down and chicken feathers, they're not likely to be anything any camper would want today. Even a Boy Scout troop probably wouldn't want it.

          Maybe find a re-enactor group and sell it for whatever you can get?

          Maury

          Comment

          • Barryeye
            Senior Member
            • Dec 2009
            • 566

            #6
            You could well be right. I think I'll hock it off on a local auction sight. There is just no place for it in my collection but I don't have the heart to dump it. In its day it served me well.
            Is it not better to place a question mark upon a problem while seeking an answer than to put the label `God` there and consider the matter closed? Joseph Lewis

            Comment

            • 5MadFarmers
              Senior Member
              • Nov 2009
              • 2815

              #7
              Based on the DSA number I'd say 1963 but I'm not an expert on those.

              The 1949 sleeping bag normally had the 1945 outer case. They were made into the 1970s. Replaced by the two bag system but I'm murky on that. Intermediate Cold and Extreme Cold? I think that's it. I think the 1949 started as a two bag system also - inner and outer. Which would make sense as it replaced the two bag system - Mountain/Arctic (circa 1943) (via the M-1945). Which replaced the two bag M-1942.

              1942: 2
              1943: 2 (mountain/arctic)
              1945: 2 (inner/outer)
              1949: 2 (inner/outer)

              Yeah, something like that. All had an additional outer cover with them and the 1942-1945 also had a carrying thing. So 4 total items if one doesn't count the optional liner. So let's make that 5 items. Nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition.
              Last edited by 5MadFarmers; 02-13-2012, 08:10.

              Comment

              • 5MadFarmers
                Senior Member
                • Nov 2009
                • 2815

                #8


                I guess I remembered right. The inner bag alone is "Mountain" while putting it inside the outer bag makes it "Arctic." Using the Arctic bag alone is apparently verboten.

                Comment

                • Barryeye
                  Senior Member
                  • Dec 2009
                  • 566

                  #9
                  Thank you 5Madfarmers. I've now placed it on a local auction site and it has one bid already. Thanks to the kind people on this forum I should be able to answer any questions I get.
                  Is it not better to place a question mark upon a problem while seeking an answer than to put the label `God` there and consider the matter closed? Joseph Lewis

                  Comment

                  • pcox
                    Senior Member
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 386

                    #10
                    You guys are bringing back old memories. It got so cold in our barracks at Fort Wainwright that I sometimes slept in my arctic sleeping bag on top of my bunk. My feet are still cold.

                    Comment

                    • thorin6
                      Senior Member
                      • Aug 2009
                      • 360

                      #11
                      Originally posted by 5MadFarmers

                      I guess I remembered right. The inner bag alone is "Mountain" while putting it inside the outer bag makes it "Arctic." Using the Arctic bag alone is apparently verboten.
                      Not quite right; when I went through Ranger School in the October/November time frame many years ago, we only carried the outer bag (too much weight for the inner bag). Of course, I only used it once, as apparently sleeping was a verboten activity activity then.

                      Comment

                      • 5MadFarmers
                        Senior Member
                        • Nov 2009
                        • 2815

                        #12
                        So you had the outer (arctic) alone. I wonder why you just didn't have the inner (mountain)? They both were protected by the M-1945 cover as either/both can go inside of it. Interesting.

                        Comment

                        • thorin6
                          Senior Member
                          • Aug 2009
                          • 360

                          #13
                          It may be that I misunderstood the combinations. Here is a link to an explaination:

                          Reading that, plus 5MadFarmers' combintations, makes me understand that we only carried the M1945 cover in Ranger School because of the weight and space limitations; in 25 years I was only issued the inner bag plus the cover. I could have used both in Korea up on the DMZ when we slept in tents; the Siberian high pushed temperatures down to 5 to 10 degress below zero (wind chill down to 15-20 below).
                          As an aside, I picked up a M1949 mountain bag and M1945 cover dated in the early 1950s (Korean War vintage), and I also have a 1945 dated blanket style mummy sleeping bag (World War II Infantry Sleeping Bag) with the same vintage M1945 cover. Still haven't seen the artic cover anywhere.

                          Comment

                          • 5MadFarmers
                            Senior Member
                            • Nov 2009
                            • 2815

                            #14
                            Originally posted by thorin6
                            It may be that I misunderstood the combinations. Here is a link to an explaination:
                            http://olive-drab.com/od_soldiers_gear_sleeping_bag.php
                            Great Moogly Boogly. He misses much and is incorrect on much. The order:
                            Bag, Sleeping
                            Bag, Sleeping, M-1940 (and iterations)
                            Bag, Sleeping, M-1942
                            Bag, Sleeping, Mountain
                            Bag, Sleeping, Arctic
                            Bag, Sleeping, Wool
                            Bag, Sleeping, Mountain, M-1945
                            Bag, Sleeping, Arctic, M-1945

                            That's not accounting associated covers and carriers. I'm missing the first one (bag, sleeping) but have examples of the rest.

                            ====

                            Tag for 1940:


                            That's kind of an interesting system. Has an inner bag of wool which isn't terribly different from the one they introduced later.



                            1942 inner and outer. Carrier almost out of photo on left.

                            ====



                            Another. The M-1942s all have interesting colored interior bags. This one is yellow while the last was salmon.

                            ====



                            Mountain, Arctic, case and carrier. Case was also used for the wool bags.

                            ====



                            M-1945. M-1949 isn't terribly different. This on introduced the M-1945 case (not pictured).

                            ====



                            M-1945 label.




                            M-1949 label.

                            Almost identical.

                            Thus ends the bags.

                            Comment

                            • Johnny P
                              Senior Member
                              • Aug 2009
                              • 6260

                              #15
                              The strangest bag of all was a survival bag for air crews. It came in a green plastic/fiberglass case with a bolt right through the middle, and taped edges of the case. I finally gave in to curiosity and opened it. As the nut on the bolt was loosened the plastic case started swelling, and out comes a basic down mummy bag. The bag has no zipper, and only a drawstring at the top. Of course it has numerous holes where the bolt was put through the middle of the box to hold it all together. Probably good down to slightly below freezing, but much better than nothing.

                              Comment

                              Working...