WW1 Uniform Question

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Dick Hosmer
    Very Senior Member - OFC
    • Aug 2009
    • 5993

    #1

    WW1 Uniform Question

    Ran into something totally out of my area of expertise, and need some idea of value. Can take pics if needed. Found a blouse, trousers, leggings, and overseas cap from what has to be the WW1 period.

    All items are khaki wool. Condition is what I would call very good, one very small tear, but generally moth free. It was wadded/rolled and would need a good ironing to be presentable.

    Blouse is heavily padded around the shoulders, weighs much more than I expected, yet is for a small man. Has nothing on right sleeve, but left sleeve has one red chevron (PFC?) at upper arm, and two khaki chevrons at wrist. Unit patch is a large red arrow pointing up, with short bar at center.

    Trousers lace at bottom of legs, and are reinforced at inner thighs. One legging has a cord at one end, the other does not.

    Cap has a bronze disc at left front with M A over crossed rifles over G. (I could be wrong about the letters as I'm working from memory, will recheck)

    What have I got?

    Many thanks.
    Last edited by Dick Hosmer; 08-17-2014, 07:00. Reason: Unsure of badge letters
  • JBinIll
    Senior Member
    • Apr 2010
    • 5608

    #2
    The Division patch,red arrow,is the 32nd Division.Red chevron that looks like a PFC stripe is a discharge stripe.The ones at the wrist are for overseas service,if I remember correctly two would indicate 12 months service.

    Sure the disc on the cap isn't MG instead of MA?
    A man with a sword may talk of peace.A man with out a sword may talk of peace,but he must talk very fast indeed.

    Comment

    • Dick Hosmer
      Very Senior Member - OFC
      • Aug 2009
      • 5993

      #3
      Originally posted by JBinIll
      The Division patch,red arrow,is the 32nd Division.Red chevron that looks like a PFC stripe is a discharge stripe.The ones at the wrist are for overseas service,if I remember correctly two would indicate 12 months service.

      Sure the disc on the cap isn't MG instead of MA?
      Thanks JB. I did a little Googling after posting, and agree 100% about the patches. Definitely need to recheck the disc - it may well be M G over A. Will do that today. Did not find either, however, during my search.

      Comment

      • JBinIll
        Senior Member
        • Apr 2010
        • 5608

        #4
        MG over A would make more sense,Machine Gun Battalion Co.A.There were two MG battalions in the 32nd in WW1.Are there collar discs on the tunic?
        Last edited by JBinIll; 08-17-2014, 08:40.
        A man with a sword may talk of peace.A man with out a sword may talk of peace,but he must talk very fast indeed.

        Comment

        • Dick Hosmer
          Very Senior Member - OFC
          • Aug 2009
          • 5993

          #5
          92nd or 32nd? Nope, no collar discs (first thing I looked for). Were all trousers reinforced? That used to be a sign of the cavalry, or any other mounted troops.

          Comment

          • JBinIll
            Senior Member
            • Apr 2010
            • 5608

            #6
            32nd,mis typed.All the trousers I've ever had of that vintage were re-enforced like that.
            A man with a sword may talk of peace.A man with out a sword may talk of peace,but he must talk very fast indeed.

            Comment

            • Dick Hosmer
              Very Senior Member - OFC
              • Aug 2009
              • 5993

              #7
              Quite a prestigious history for that unit, at least according to Wikipedia. The grouping is part of an estate sale we are doing (sideline of our antique store) in northern CA, though apparently the men were from Michigan and Wisconsin.

              Any idea of a ballpark value? If high, we'll likely sell it for our client, if not, I may buy it for display with my 1903 rifle. Thanks again.

              Comment

              • JBinIll
                Senior Member
                • Apr 2010
                • 5608

                #8
                I can't really give an honest value on it,I haven't collected in that area for some years.Checking the auction sites for similar sales is about as good as any.If you could put a name with it,it attracts more attention.Don't have a set of dog tags to go with it from the estate do ya?
                A man with a sword may talk of peace.A man with out a sword may talk of peace,but he must talk very fast indeed.

                Comment

                • Dick Hosmer
                  Very Senior Member - OFC
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 5993

                  #9
                  Dogtags? Not so far, anyhow. Nor a helmet. Can probably get an ID though. Still searching.
                  Last edited by Dick Hosmer; 08-18-2014, 07:55.

                  Comment

                  • 5MadFarmers
                    Senior Member
                    • Nov 2009
                    • 2815

                    #10
                    32nd was formed from the Michigan and Wisconsin NG. Each division had three MG battalions: one assigned to each brigade and one under division control. 63rd brigade was Michigan whereas 64th was Wisconsin.

                    Funny thing, and coincidence, that you mention cavalry and the trousers. WW1 divisions were huge. Much bigger units than prewar. The 64th brigade, having two regiments of infantry, ate the 4 Wisconsin pre-war regiments. Add the associated parts and it ate the fifth Wisconsin infantry regiment and associated units. Generically for the NG->WW1 divisions that held true. They fed the State infantry regiments into the new ones. So where did the MG battalion men typically come from?

                    The State Cavalry units.

                    Comment

                    • JBinIll
                      Senior Member
                      • Apr 2010
                      • 5608

                      #11
                      Originally posted by 5MadFarmers
                      32nd was formed from the Michigan and Wisconsin NG. Each division had three MG battalions: one assigned to each brigade and one under division control. 63rd brigade was Michigan whereas 64th was Wisconsin.

                      Funny thing, and coincidence, that you mention cavalry and the trousers. WW1 divisions were huge. Much bigger units than prewar. The 64th brigade, having two regiments of infantry, ate the 4 Wisconsin pre-war regiments. Add the associated parts and it ate the fifth Wisconsin infantry regiment and associated units. Generically for the NG->WW1 divisions that held true. They fed the State infantry regiments into the new ones. So where did the MG battalion men typically come from?

                      The State Cavalry units.
                      Sometimes,not always-



                      A man with a sword may talk of peace.A man with out a sword may talk of peace,but he must talk very fast indeed.

                      Comment

                      • John Sukey
                        Very Senior Member - OFC Deceased
                        • Aug 2009
                        • 12224

                        #12
                        If the blouse was heavily padded on the shoulders it would make sense for a machine gun unit. Carrying the gun or the tripod on your shoulder.

                        Comment

                        • 5MadFarmers
                          Senior Member
                          • Nov 2009
                          • 2815

                          #13
                          Originally posted by JBinIll
                          Sometimes,not always-
                          Yup, an exception. Typically that's where they came from.

                          Comment

                          Working...