Ithaca Vietnam Riot on Gunbroker

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • scosgt
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2011
    • 673

    #1

    Ithaca Vietnam Riot on Gunbroker

    This one is the real deal

    http://www.gunbroker.com/Auction/Vie...Item=467515157
  • PhillipM
    Very Senior Member - OFC
    • Aug 2009
    • 5937

    #2
    I'm not doubting it's original and as described, but shouldn't there be a flaming bomb?
    Phillip McGregor (OFC)
    "I am neither a fire arms nor a ballistics expert, but I was a combat infantry officer in the Great War, and I absolutely know that the bullet from an infantry rifle has to be able to shoot through things." General Douglas MacArthur

    Comment

    • scosgt
      Senior Member
      • Mar 2011
      • 673

      #3
      Originally posted by PhillipM
      I'm not doubting it's original and as described, but shouldn't there be a flaming bomb?
      Nope. Not on VietNam guns. That gun is right as rain.

      Comment

      • James B.
        Junior Member
        • Oct 2009
        • 28

        #4
        But does it have a swivel on the stock? I asked the seller, he hasn't replied. Only 4 pics. of a gun with a buy now of $6500 and no returns is a red flag for me.

        Comment

        • joem
          Senior Member, Deceased
          • Aug 2009
          • 11835

          #5
          I carried a shotgun for a bit. I wish I would have paid more attention to what it was. For ammo we had buck shot and beehive rounds. Been really neat if I could have sent it home.

          Comment

          • scosgt
            Senior Member
            • Mar 2011
            • 673

            #6
            I have no problem at all with the gun, but the $3000 high bid was more than enough, I personally see it as a$2500 gun.
            VN guns do not generate the collector interest of WWII guns, and it is not yet C&R, (soon probably) which tends to increase the interest.
            The $3K offer was more than fair. The owner can ask whatever he wants, but the market will dictate in the end.

            Comment

            • Tom Doniphon
              Senior Member
              • Aug 2009
              • 526

              #7
              I don't think the lack of a rear swivel is an issue. I have data on a couple of other guns in the same serial number range that are exactly like this gun --- they have the front swivel but not the rear one.

              Comment

              • scosgt
                Senior Member
                • Mar 2011
                • 673

                #8
                I agree. No rear swivel is correct.

                I have seen several 1960's Police Issue trench guns new in the box. They are basically identical. The screw in swivel is in the box, but not installed.

                Comment

                • PhillipM
                  Very Senior Member - OFC
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 5937

                  #9
                  Originally posted by joem
                  I carried a shotgun for a bit. I wish I would have paid more attention to what it was. For ammo we had buck shot and beehive rounds. Been really neat if I could have sent it home.
                  In a long ago post Marine A5 snipers said shotguns were hard to come by and everyone wanted one.
                  Phillip McGregor (OFC)
                  "I am neither a fire arms nor a ballistics expert, but I was a combat infantry officer in the Great War, and I absolutely know that the bullet from an infantry rifle has to be able to shoot through things." General Douglas MacArthur

                  Comment

                  Working...