Killers with ARs not the only threat to our kids ...

[dogtag]

Articles like the attached link seem to be an every
day news story in the Dly Mail. My main source,
Drudge nor any other of our media ever cover these
horrible stories, but they're happening just the same
whether they cover them or not.
Maybe they don't want to shock us ? Maybe they
figure Mueller's witch hunt far more newsworthy.
Whatever.
The incidence of toddlers being raped, and, more often
than not, murdered seems to have reached epidemic
proportions.
Now I know some of the more liberal members here,
you know who you are, think the dly mail a scandal
sheet - mainly because they publish things that aren't
supposed to happen in their idea of the perfect socialistic
utopia they would like America to be. But they are
happening with sickening regularity.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...daughters.html

[blackhawknj]

The most dangerous place for a child is in the womb. More die there than anyplace else.

[Vern Humphrey]

The most dangerous place for a child is in the womb. More die there than anyplace else.

Amen. Since Roe v. Wade, we've killed four or five times as many innocent human beings in this country than the Nazis killed in the Holocaust.

[free1954]

The most dangerous place for a child is in the womb. More die there than anyplace else.

very true sir. and sad. if we are going to have legalized abortion let's make it retroactive. that way instead of just the innocents being murdered, mothers would have the option of taking out their rotten children.

[clintonhater]

Amen. Since Roe v. Wade, we've killed four or five times as many innocent human beings in this country than the Nazis killed in the Holocaust.

How do you know they would have grown up to be innocent? A high proportion of them come from the lowest dregs of society; do we need more of them? But even a decent woman forced into motherhood by law, if abortion were unavailable, would be an "unwilling" mother; is that conducive to good parenting?

Biggest problem with abortion is that it's not mandatory for women whose unchecked breeding is a blight on society.

[sid]

Clintonhater; +1 on this post. If a woman wants an abortion then that is a decision for her and her doctor, not for a politician. The overwhelming majority of the women in this country are pro-choice and they vote.

[bostonbound]

Clintonhater; +1 on this post. If a woman wants an abortion then that is a decision for her and her doctor, not for a politician. The overwhelming majority of the women in this country are pro-choice and they vote.

Good to know that fathers don't have a vote on the murder of their children.

[clintonhater]

Good to know that fathers don't have a vote on the murder of their children.

Many of these women can only make a wild guess as to who the fathers might be. But even if they know for sure, do the fathers have 9 months of pregnancy to endure? If these fathers are so concerned, how did they forget about the marriage license? Because the vast majority of abortions are performed on unmarried women.

[blackhawknj]

An illegitimacy rate of 40% means the least desireable are reproducing the most. But of course a child for them is a meal ticket.
Too many men are pro-choice-that's why the abortion rate is so high. And as many women and children will tell you, the "new breed" of father is the don't care one.