Giuliani says Mueller will not indict Trump

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • rkohut
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2010
    • 1115

    #1

    Giuliani says Mueller will not indict Trump

    Since the Dems/MSM demanded what essentially was a 'proctology' exam to be done on Trump, now lets do a 'proctology' exam on the FBI and CIA.

    Same thing heh? Same game plan, same methodology. Sounds fair to me.

    Oh boy, this is going to be fun.

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...-indict-trump/
  • Sandpebble
    Senior Member
    • Mar 2017
    • 2196

    #2
    Originally posted by rkohut
    Since the Dems/MSM demanded what essentially was a 'proctology' exam to be done on Trump, now lets do a 'proctology' exam on the FBI and CIA.

    Same thing heh? Same game plan, same methodology. Sounds fair to me.

    Oh boy, this is going to be fun.

    http://www.breitbart.com/big-governm...-indict-trump/
    OK... it is in fact the law....a sitting President cannot be indicted..... does that mean he's still a good guy?

    Sorry... I still believe the CIA and the FBI have done more for my country than a fake reality TV star / real estate tycoon.... no matter how much Fox News{Russian} channel tries to convince me otherwise

    Comment

    • rkohut
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2010
      • 1115

      #3
      Originally posted by Sandpebble
      OK... it is in fact the law....a sitting President cannot be indicted..... does that mean he's still a good guy?

      Sorry... I still believe the CIA and the FBI have done more for my country than a fake reality TV star / real estate tycoon.... no matter how much Fox News{Russian} channel tries to convince me otherwise

      Comment

      • Sandpebble
        Senior Member
        • Mar 2017
        • 2196

        #4
        Originally posted by rkohut
        keep laughing.... especially when your wonderfull tax break sunsets... and Trump and friends... doesn't.

        so... whats the deal... you admire cops and military ... but have allowed a fake reality star to convince you the FBI and CIA are bad ??? ... fool

        Comment

        • dryheat
          Senior Member
          • Sep 2009
          • 10587

          #5
          How did Giuliani get into this? This whole thing reminds me of an oil slick that just spreads and spreads. It's stupid. I thought it was stupid one week after the election. I hate the news. It's like binge watching Jerry Springer. I hate people who watch Jerry Springer.
          If I should die before I wake...great,a little more sleep.

          Comment

          • m1ashooter
            Senior Member
            • May 2011
            • 3220

            #6
            Do you believe the leadership of the FBI and the CIA may have been doing something not in their charter in reguards to the Trump Campaign. After all this time I'm believing they overstepped their bounds.
            To Error Is Human To Forgive Is Not SAC Policy

            Comment

            • togor
              Banned
              • Nov 2009
              • 17610

              #7
              I think rkohut (and perhaps others here) are high on a QAnon trip right now.
              Last edited by togor; 05-16-2018, 05:09.

              Comment

              • TomSudz
                Senior Member
                • Aug 2009
                • 3676

                #8
                Originally posted by Sandpebble
                Sorry... I still believe the CIA and the FBI have done more TO my country than a fake reality TV star / real estate tycoon.
                Fixed it for ya.
                I dream of a better world. One where chickens may cross the road without their motives being questioned.

                Comment

                • Vern Humphrey
                  Administrator - OFC
                  • Aug 2009
                  • 15875

                  #9
                  Guys, don't feed the trolls.

                  Comment

                  • rkohut
                    Senior Member
                    • Aug 2010
                    • 1115

                    #10
                    None of this Special Counsel means anything. It will be nullified as the facts come out.

                    Every detail will fall by the wayside because....it's the fruit of the poisonous tree.

                    Comment

                    • rkohut
                      Senior Member
                      • Aug 2010
                      • 1115

                      #11
                      Originally posted by togor
                      I think rkohut (and perhaps others here) are high on a QAnon trip right now.
                      Did you acquire that platitude from your master, who you must obey ---> CNN?

                      Comment

                      • rkohut
                        Senior Member
                        • Aug 2010
                        • 1115

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Sandpebble
                        OK... it is in fact the law....a sitting President cannot be indicted..... does that mean he's still a good guy?
                        According to an opinion in the NYT, you can indict a sitting President.

                        https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/26/o...ent-trial.html

                        Of course if it comes from NYT, that means the exact opposite is probably true, so it looks like you are correct.

                        Comment

                        • RED
                          Very Senior Member - OFC
                          • Aug 2009
                          • 11689

                          #13
                          Originally posted by rkohut
                          According to an opinion in the NYT, you can indict a sitting President.

                          https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/26/o...ent-trial.html

                          Of course if it comes from NYT, that means the exact opposite is probably true, so it looks like you are correct.
                          Why doesn't he just pardon himself for every crime he could possibly have committed in the past 50 years and for the next 50 years as well?

                          Comment

                          • leftyo

                            #14
                            Originally posted by RED
                            Why doesn't he just pardon himself for every crime he could possibly have committed in the past 50 years and for the next 50 years as well?
                            probably because one needs to be charged and convicted before one can receive a pardon.

                            Comment

                            • Allen
                              Moderator
                              • Sep 2009
                              • 10583

                              #15
                              Originally posted by leftyo
                              probably because one needs to be charged and convicted before one can receive a pardon.
                              I would take it one step further:

                              One needs to actually break the law first.

                              Comment

                              Working...