Canada Day and Tariffs

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Mark in Ottawa
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 1744

    #1

    Canada Day and Tariffs

    Today is Canada's 151st birthday.

    It is also the day that $16.7 billion dollar's worth of tariffs start to get applied to American made products. In addition to the same 10% and 25% tariffs on American steel and aluminum that Trump applied to Canadian steel and aluminum, the Canadian government has applied tariffs to a wide range of consumer products. The Canadian government has been researching this matter for a long time and they have carefully selected products that are either also made in Canada or are easily available from other countries. In addition however, every product selected for a tariff comes from a state that strongly supported Trump. Bourbon just became a lot more expensive.

    What a total and unnecessary mess.

    I would say that they are putting the heat on but we don't need any more heat today. The humidex here in Ottawa is about 108 degrees F and is expected to rise to 111 tomorrow; the hottest that I can ever recall. Its hard to believe that Ottawa is the coldest national capital in the world; colder than Moscow even!
  • IditarodJoe
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 1529

    #2
    Happy Canada Day!

    (... and, on days like this, air conditioning is your friend. )
    "They've took the fun out of running the race. You never see a campfire anywhere. There's never any time for visiting." - Joe Redington Sr., 1997

    Comment

    • togor
      Banned
      • Nov 2009
      • 17610

      #3
      As I long ago suggested, the problem with Trump's middle-finger-to-the-rest-of-the-world-except-for-countries-ruled-by-certain-dictators approach is that it would give long time friends and partners a significant financial incentive to reevaluate their relationships with Uncle Sam. Red disagrees, thinks this is a huge win, but my sense is that it leads to lower living standards in the USA as stuff gets more expensive and capital seeks paths around tariffs.

      China has their 2025 plan and the Americans have some old coots just pulling tariffs out of their butts and calling it a National Security contingency.

      Comment

      • S.A. Boggs
        Senior Member
        • Aug 2009
        • 8568

        #4
        Now the rest of the story! I was watching the President today during an interview and he was asked about the tariffs which now made sense, especially with our neighbor Canada. During the last economic summit President Trump asked all nations to drop all barriers to free trade, the other nations replied No! Now what the President did makes sense, a great deal of sense. This was not reported by our NAZI press but I heard and saw the President say that. Togor, before you get in an uproar over NAZI please explain the National Socialist avowed from NY's election. If Canada drops all trade barriers with the US, the US will do the same, it is as simple as that. If the US and Canada are friends, do we need trade barriers? Our press wouldn't give our President the time of day. If any country can beat us at our gave I am willing to accept that as reality, otherwise I am willing to give the President the ability to continue.
        Sam

        Comment

        • togor
          Banned
          • Nov 2009
          • 17610

          #5
          Sam only a dolt would fall for the "zero tariffs everywhere" line from Trump. So congratulations on that.

          US cost advantage on dairy production would kill the Canadian dairy industry. Canucks don't want that for food security reasons. And security is the reason we jacked tariffs on imported aluminum and steel. Zero tariffs, give me a break. He goes on Fox to give a bullsh*t talking point.

          It has always been about finding the optimal balance between foreign and domestic, on both the supply and demand sides. Zero tariffs everywhere would make that harder, not easier. Devil always in the details on trade and the coots running our trade policy will be led to slaughter and turned into pet food.
          Last edited by togor; 07-01-2018, 11:41.

          Comment

          • Roadkingtrax
            Senior Member
            • Feb 2010
            • 7835

            #6
            If you want true parity, US subsidized dairy should be ended. Your tax dollars at work.
            "The first gun that was fired at Fort Sumter sounded the death-knell of slavery. They who fired it were the greatest practical abolitionists this nation has produced." ~BG D. Ullman

            Comment

            • S.A. Boggs
              Senior Member
              • Aug 2009
              • 8568

              #7
              Originally posted by togor
              Sam only a dolt would fall for the "zero tariffs everywhere" line from Trump. So congratulations on that.

              US cost advantage on dairy production would kill the Canadian dairy industry. Canucks don't want that for food security reasons. And security is the reason we jacked tariffs on imported aluminum and steel. Zero tariffs, give me a break. He goes on Fox to give a bullsh*t talking point.

              It has always been about finding the optimal balance between foreign and domestic, on both the supply and demand sides. Zero tariffs everywhere would make that harder, not easier. Devil always in the details on trade and the coots running our trade policy will be led to slaughter and turned into pet food.
              A good national socialists toes the party line of being anti-American as usual, nothing to see or hear here. Must be from following the other great pseudo American Barry Soweto.
              Sam

              Comment

              • bostonbound
                Senior Member
                • Aug 2013
                • 184

                #8
                Originally posted by togor
                Sam only a dolt would fall for the "zero tariffs everywhere" line from Trump. So congratulations on that.

                US cost advantage on dairy production would kill the Canadian dairy industry. Canucks don't want that for food security reasons. And security is the reason we jacked tariffs on imported aluminum and steel. Zero tariffs, give me a break. He goes on Fox to give a bullsh*t talking point.

                It has always been about finding the optimal balance between foreign and domestic, on both the supply and demand sides. Zero tariffs everywhere would make that harder, not easier. Devil always in the details on trade and the coots running our trade policy will be led to slaughter and turned into pet food.
                I understand your reasoning - tariffs imposed on the US are great - totally understandable for national security (food security) reasons.

                Tariffs imposed by the US for the same reason are bad.

                Your lack of logic is phenomenal - unless you have other reasons for wanting to destroy the US.

                Comment

                • togor
                  Banned
                  • Nov 2009
                  • 17610

                  #9
                  Oh so now the measure of whether one is pro-American or not is how they identify with the Dear Leader? You're half-boiled already Boggs and yet you insist the water temperature is just fine.

                  Comment

                  • togor
                    Banned
                    • Nov 2009
                    • 17610

                    #10
                    Originally posted by bostonbound
                    I understand your reasoning - tariffs imposed on the US are great - totally understandable for national security (food security) reasons.

                    Tariffs imposed by the US for the same reason are bad.

                    Your lack of logic is phenomenal - unless you have other reasons for wanting to destroy the US.
                    Not my logic you're criticizing. It's Trump's, as seen through the looking glass. Our Canuck members here at the forum are like friendly canaries. They're telling you how it looks on the outside but Trumpists just don't wanna know. They're still at trade wars are good and easy to win.

                    Comment

                    • bostonbound
                      Senior Member
                      • Aug 2013
                      • 184

                      #11
                      So Canada is targeting imports from "swing states" and Republican states in advance of the mid-term elections. It must be OK for Canada to try to interfere in US elections, now.

                      Originally posted by togor
                      Not my logic you're criticizing. It's Trump's, as seen through the looking glass. Our Canuck members here at the forum are like friendly canaries. They're telling you how it looks on the outside but Trumpists just don't wanna know. They're still at trade wars are good and easy to win.
                      You are the one who stated that anti-American tariffs were just fine, while anti-Canadian tariffs were bad.

                      Let's put restrictive tariffs on anything produced by Canada that is also produced in the US. Per togor that would be reasonable since it is product security (food and other US products).
                      Last edited by bostonbound; 07-01-2018, 02:11.

                      Comment

                      • TomSudz
                        Senior Member
                        • Aug 2009
                        • 3676

                        #12
                        The surest way to lose any war is to not fight it.
                        I dream of a better world. One where chickens may cross the road without their motives being questioned.

                        Comment

                        • togor
                          Banned
                          • Nov 2009
                          • 17610

                          #13
                          BB, you're showing an inability to see multiple sides of an issue. What I pointed out is that the logic that motivates Canada to sustain a much smaller dairy industry next to the American dairy colossus (a very real threat, given the size disparity and difference in base production costs) is the same logic that Trump sites to protect steel and aluminum foundaries, even as Trump claims that zero tariffs are what he's really after. Zero tariffs on Chinese steel? China has 2/3 of the world's furnaces! It wouldn't matter how many American cars they bought, because those cars would be made here out of imported steel! You can be forgiven for being utterly confused on the details. Trump, less so.

                          Comment

                          • S.A. Boggs
                            Senior Member
                            • Aug 2009
                            • 8568

                            #14
                            Originally posted by togor
                            BB, you're showing an inability to see multiple sides of an issue. What I pointed out is that the logic that motivates Canada to sustain a much smaller dairy industry next to the American dairy colossus (a very real threat, given the size disparity and difference in base production costs) is the same logic that Trump sites to protect steel and aluminum foundaries, even as Trump claims that zero tariffs are what he's really after. Zero tariffs on Chinese steel? China has 2/3 of the world's furnaces! It wouldn't matter how many American cars they bought, because those cars would be made here out of imported steel! You can be forgiven for being utterly confused on the details. Trump, less so.
                            So glad that a "trained" person has so much vast knowledge on almost every subject.
                            Sam

                            Comment

                            • togor
                              Banned
                              • Nov 2009
                              • 17610

                              #15
                              If someone wants to challenge their thinking on US China trade, here is a good read. There are many more facets to this than are being presented on Fox News, or for that matter, CNN or MSNBC.

                              The Trump administration views the U.S.-China trade relationship upside down: It’s not Americans who suffer from Chinese surplus.

                              Comment

                              Working...