Another Teen Harassed For Wearing MAGA Hat

[rayg]

What's up with so much hate...... I wonder if the wearer was an adult if they would have tried that..

http://dailycaller.com/2018/07/21/te...ssed-maga-hat/

http://dailycaller.com/2018/07/04/st...-tosses-drink/

[JB White]

Ray, I have a question for you and the others. Why is it when something happens to someone on our side, we use the term harassed? When something less intense happens to them they are attacked, bullied, their civil rights are infringed by racists and Nazis?

The hate has been indoctrinated into them. Of course, they believe they are being correct. They don't see themselves as skinheads, Klansmen, Stazi etc. all the titles and buzzwords they like to toss out there to dramatize their point. They truly believe they are the only righteous Americans.

[Sandpebble]

Just the other day we watched on the news a man in his 60s loudly berating and demeaning a woman in a park because of a T shirt she wore that said Puerto Rico on the front .

" Shouldn't be allowed to wear that xxxx in America " he said and demanded to know if she was an American citizen .

His tirade was so intense that a nearby cop had no option but to arrest him......

OK ..... now we can swing the discussion back to how much hatred liberals hold in their hearts because thats how they are "trained "

[rayg]

I believe it's something called brain matter, or lack of it

[rayg]

"OK ..... now we can swing the discussion back to how much hatred liberals hold in their hearts because thats how they are "trained "

I know. you're trying to be a good liberal and trying to even out the blame. But one incident doesn't over come all the numerous times the left has done it. I'm not taking sides but bringing reality into the discussion instead of BS,

[Sandpebble]

"OK ..... now we can swing the discussion back to how much hatred liberals hold in their hearts because thats how they are "trained "

I know. you're trying to be a good liberal and trying to even out the blame. But one incident doesn't over come all the numerous times the left has done it. I'm not taking sides but bringing reality into the discussion instead of BS,

hehehehehahahahhaheheh.... oh my God... lol... reality ! god thats funny, thanks Ray

[rayg]

Glad you agree........

[rayg]

Here's another nut case not liking an item with a statement they don't agree with, Lol

A poster wrote on Breitbart News Network

"Trump Derangement Syndrome is everywhere. I wore a Hillary for Prison t-shirt in a Houston supermarket once. Some deranged purple-haired cow took pancake syrup off the shelf and tried to pour it on me. I knew the store security and they took her funky ass away in a police cruiser.....FUN TIMES!!!"

[clintonhater]

Just the other day we watched on the news a man in his 60s loudly berating and demeaning a woman in a park because of a T shirt she wore that said Puerto Rico on the front .

The drunken fool went too far & is now paying for it. But if she had the right to make a deliberate political statement by wearing it in a public place--clearly, her intent--why shouldn't anyone who disagreed with that "message" have the same right, short of behavior that would constitute a criminal offense?

[Sandpebble]

The drunken fool went too far & is now paying for it. But if she had the right to make a deliberate political statement by wearing it in a public place--clearly, her intent--why shouldn't anyone who disagreed with that "message" have the same right, short of behavior that would constitute a criminal offense?

Clinton.... you need to read your own sentences Sir. I'm sorry but it never would have crossed my mind that "Puerto Rico " on a shirt would be considered a deliberate political statement .

and if you do follow your own words.... please don't whine if a lib harrases a mag hat wearer

[rayg]

[QUOTE= you need to read your own sentences Sir. I'm sorry but it never would have crossed my mind that "Puerto Rico " on a shirt would be considered a deliberate political statement .[/QUOTE]

Excuse me, then why did you attempt to compare and counter the taking of the hats the same as a conservative's harassment of the girl wearing that shirt.... Am I missing something?

Your Quote: Just the other day we watched on the news a man in his 60s loudly berating and demeaning a woman in a park because of a T shirt she wore that said Puerto Rico on the front :
.
I guess I'm confused, did I misunderstand your original post?

[Sandpebble]

Excuse me, then why did you attempt to compare and counter the taking of the hats the same as a conservative's harassment of the girl wearing that shirt.... Am I missing something?

Your Quote: Just the other day we watched on the news a man in his 60s loudly berating and demeaning a woman in a park because of a T shirt she wore that said Puerto Rico on the front :
.
I guess I'm confused, did I misunderstand your original post?

Yes Ray, you are confused..... go back and read everything said a little more slowly

[clintonhater]

Clinton.... you need to read your own sentences Sir. I'm sorry but it never would have crossed my mind that "Puerto Rico " on a shirt would be considered a deliberate political statement .

Then Puerto Ricans should shut up about blaming Trump for "deliberately" withholding aid from PR after the hurricane; in that context, it is a political statement, & that's what the drunken fool was reacting to, though I'm not defending his stupid actions, which merely provided more grist for the Trump-hating media.

[rayg]

Yes Ray, you are confused..... go back and read everything said a little more slowly

How am I confused? You compared the guy criticizing the girl about the shirt as the same as the two incidents where the hats were taken to show that there is harrasment both ways. At least that is what I took from your post and the comparison of the three incidences. Where am I wrong there?

[Vern Humphrey]

How am I confused? You compared the guy criticizing the girl about the shirt as the same as the two incidents where the hats were taken to show that there is harrasment both ways. At least that is what I took from your post and the comparison of the three incidences. Where am I wrong there?

You're wrong because you expect to find some logic in his remarks. Don't feed the trolls.