What exactly is this DA trying to prove ?
How the man was killed ?
The wife said she saw two bullet holes in his chest.
Without a body, how can the DA prove different ?
And what would be the point in naming the killers
after all this time even if that's possible ?
Sounds like a Politically Correct waste of money
and time which could be better spent on more recent
crimes.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-reopened.html
How the man was killed ?
The wife said she saw two bullet holes in his chest.
Without a body, how can the DA prove different ?
And what would be the point in naming the killers
after all this time even if that's possible ?
Sounds like a Politically Correct waste of money
and time which could be better spent on more recent
crimes.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-reopened.html

Comment