West Virginia Justices impeached.
Collapse
X
-
Tags: None
-
I've seen it done both ways -- you really don't get better judges either way. Now term limits would work -- remember the Massachusetts Supreme Court Justice who sneered, "I don't care! I'm appointed for life!" And making it easier to fire them would also help. The great flaw in the American system is that we don't have true accountability.Originally posted by REDWow! What a mess. It has been my experience that electing judges is a mistake especially when the term is for 12 years or longer. It is in no way a "democratic," way to do it. First of all, the people running almost never actually campaign and often doesn't run as either a Republican or a Democrat. The voters simply have little or no information as to the qualifications or political slant of the very often unopposed candidate.
I think a better way would be for the Governor to appoint and the State Legislature to confirm. Just my $.02 -
-
The problem with electing judges is its impossible to find information on them. I actually always vote not to retain unless I am familiar with them. If they are terrible enough people in the know will also vote that way. It has been rare a local judge is voted out. The one time I can remember was a Judge thats problems made it to the paper.Comment
-
In New Jersey judges are nominated by the Governor, if confirmed by the State Senate serve for 7 years, if reconfirmed can serve until they are 70. 30 years ago Governor Kean refused to re-nominate a judge he said was too lenient on criminals. Otherwise we have an Imperial Judiciary. Always whining that they are underpaid.
In 1981 one of the state top lawyers told me:
"The people who want to become judges are people who couldn't earn a living as lawyers."Comment

Comment