"Tears of rage" for USA Today: their Queen lost!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • clintonhater
    Senior Member
    • Nov 2015
    • 5220

    #1

    "Tears of rage" for USA Today: their Queen lost!

    Serena Williams will try Saturday to win her 24th Grand Slam singles title, which would tie her with Margaret Court, who has compared gay-rights activists to Nazis.


    Ran across this (written before the last match) while checking out the story that Queen Kong was of the lesboid persuasion (which I'd never heard until a defender of hers brought the subject up!). The parallel with Hillary's anticipated coronation is WONDERFUL! USA Today, along with every other mainstream media outlet, was smacking its lips with joy over the apparently dead certain prospect of the Queen (Vogue, not me, bestowed that title on her!) putting the horrible "homophobe" to shame. Oh, how unspeakably tragic that the horrible homophobe's record stands untoppled!

    I'd never heard of the horrible homophobe either, but I just became a Life Member of her fan club!
    Last edited by clintonhater; 09-10-2018, 11:57.
  • JB White
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2009
    • 13371

    #2
    Homophobic/Homophobe. A word made up by loudmothed queers to label those who don't travel their road. Is anyone really afraid of fags? I don't care much for broccoli but nobody calls me a broccoliphobe.
    2016 Chicago Cubs. MLB Champions!


    **Never quite as old as the other old farts**

    Comment

    • blackhawknj
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2011
      • 3754

      #3
      I would have thought that AIDS would have made the homos afraid of each other. Likewise the group most likely to commit violence against women is-lesbians.

      Comment

      • clintonhater
        Senior Member
        • Nov 2015
        • 5220

        #4
        Originally posted by JB White
        Homophobic/Homophobe. A word made up by loudmothed queers to label those who don't travel their road.
        But nothing to compare with their re-definition of "gay"--a fine old word formerly used in countless poems, novels, other works of literature, movie titles (not less than a dozen of those I have in my 3000+ DVD collection), as well as ordinary common speech. Of course, they couldn't have pulled it off without the enthusiastic collaboration of the media, which celebrates queerdom as a mark of distinction. It's even used here, sad to say, by some so brainwashed, apparently, by the media that they accept this idiotic perversion of the word's meaning.

        The Old Testament properly identified them for all time: Sodomite. That was also the legal & medical term for centuries; what's wrong with it now?

        Comment

        • blackhawknj
          Senior Member
          • Aug 2011
          • 3754

          #5
          Gay=Got Aids Yet ?

          Comment

          Working...