-
-
People who have low self esteem. They know everyone hates them/looks down on them so they work it. Fingers on the trigger 24/7.If I should die before I wake...great,a little more sleep.Comment
-
More complicated than that; although they have an inferiority, or "not normal," complex, they'd have to be deaf, dumb, & blind not to recognize that they are ADORED by the media, entertainment industry, & popular (i.e., degenerate) culture. FAR from being a stigma, among this major, if not dominant, segment of American culture, queerness is a positive asset. Especially so, now that they've contrived a brilliant new brand name--not homosexuals, not sexual deviants, certainly not Sodomites!, merely "gay"! Gee, who doesn't like to be around someone who's "gay"?Last edited by clintonhater; 09-19-2018, 05:02.Comment
-
Maybe Guam -- they can counterbalance the new infusions of troops so it doesn't capsize.Comment
-
GAY=Got Aids Yet ? Perusing the Web, I saw a comment asking how the homosexuals were able to come out of the AIDS plague smelling like a rose, and how the feminists gave lesbians a pass on domestic violence and violence against women. And on a Christian website, someone asked how this 2-3% gained so much clout.Comment
-
Because the Press loves deviants, and more deviant
they are the more they love 'emComment
-
Used to ride the bus from Atlanta to Columbus, Ga, back in the early '70's. Close to the time of the start of the appropriation of the word "gay" by homosexuals. Often wondered two things:
1. How the people of that rural Southern town felt about the appellation appropriation, and,
2. How often the town signs were stolen by "gays" from Atlanta (fairly large homosexual population).
I have no issue with anyone's sexual preferences or orientations; it's not my business - but "equal rights" (deserved by all) do not mean "special rights".Last edited by bostonbound; 09-21-2018, 04:55.Comment
-
Special...how? By getting marriage licenses?Comment
-
Not in the least. Marriage as a civil right should be open to all. Marriage as a religious rite (spelling difference deliberate) should be by the tenets of that Faith and not under Government control. I would actually prefer that Ministers of any Faith not be allowed to perform legal marriages (Note the word "legal" - as in civil law). In some countries (France, maybe - I'm old and the memory is faulty) you have two ceremonies - a civil marriage and a religious wedding.
But giving preference in hiring, etc. because a person is gay, or black, or female, or any other "protected class" is simple and unadulterated discrimination and "special rights".Last edited by bostonbound; 09-21-2018, 05:19.Comment
-
Not aware that people are being hired because they're gay, except maybe for certain cash-only services. But CH is our resident expert on such things.
People have been NOT hired because they're black, or female, etc. If the outrage about "protected classes" also extended to "excluded classes" as well, then I might think there was something to it other than narrowly-drawn self-interest.Last edited by togor; 09-21-2018, 06:43.Comment
-
Togor, I believe free companies have quotas deep in the HR department. So Federally protected and company preferred are two different things. I'm not saying right or wrong, as long as they are good from a business decision stand point."The first gun that was fired at Fort Sumter sounded the death-knell of slavery. They who fired it were the greatest practical abolitionists this nation has produced." ~BG D. UllmanComment
-
If "open to all" is the only relevant standard, NOT what the definition of marriage has been in ALL cultures ALL over the world since Adam & Eve, then I presume you also support plural marriage, which--unlike this perversion of the definition--has been a common, legally recognized, form of marriage within many cultures, such as the ancient Israelites, for thousands of yrs. Yet the persecution of "old school" Mormons by the fed gov't has been relentless. Why shouldn't Mormon heterosexuals enjoy the same "open to all" rights as the Sodomites?Last edited by clintonhater; 09-21-2018, 07:25.Comment
Tweet
Comment