The Force Awakens

[togor]

Quaint? Ethical lapses? Really? Sincerely. bruce.

The devil is in the details Bruce. I'm yet to see anyone here objectively list some of the things that have come to light with Trump cabinet appointees. You like writing long posts so perhaps you'll take that on.

[Vern Humphrey]

Don't feed the trolls.

Note the troll makes the accusation -- and wants somebody else to provide the data!!

[mkrad]

https://apps.washingtonpost.com/g/documents/politics/rachel-mitchells-analysis/3221/

http://thefederalist.com/2018/10/01/theres-good-case-sanctioning-christine-blasey-fords-lawyers/

[togor]

Don't feed the trolls.

Note the troll makes the accusation -- and wants somebody else to provide the data!!

Pruitt & Price come easily to mind, Vernon, but there are many more. This is clearly a case of "seek and ye shall find" the corruption, the pay for play. Drain the swamp? Yes and you have a toll bridge for sale there in Arkansas to sell, a real can't-miss money machine. I encourage Bruce to look for himself on the sound reasoning that what he finds he will be more apt to believe than if I try to force feed him information. You would have us believe you belonged in Congress?

[S.A. Boggs]

Don't feed the trolls.

Note the troll makes the accusation -- and wants somebody else to provide the data!!

Isn't this what happened to Judge Kavanaugh? Appears to be the same play book that is used.
Sam

[bostonbound]

Not quite. Teddy and Bill made their supporters overlook a lot. Harvey was thrown down onto a pike and he's history so he's obviously not too big to fail. Warren has her haters but so what. Hillary? Whatever her ethical lapses they now seem quaint compared to some of the crap going on with Trump cabinet secretaries and the big guy himself.

The thing about "too big to fail" is that it's true until it isn't.

Togor - you diminish your argument when you gloss over the glaring faults of the Democrats, and claim that they are small scale compared to Trump. It causes a person to simply dismiss the remainder of your argument when you cannot admit the "beam in your own eye."

I held my nose when voting for Trump, but did so because, despite his many and glaring faults (somebody PLEASE take away his Twitter account), he was better than the alternative.

[clintonhater]

I held my nose when voting for Trump, but did so because, despite his many and glaring faults (somebody PLEASE take away his Twitter account), he was better than the alternative.

Of course! Most of us did, in observance of the principal of "least worst"! Not included in the category of "least worst" would be another RINO looser like McCain or Bob Dole, or the latest RINO FAH, crybaby Flack.

[Vern Humphrey]

Who will not vote for the lesser of two evils automatically votes for the greater of those two evils.