National Shrine of Sodomy created in (of course) DC.

[clintonhater]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/religion/2018/10/11/matthew-shepard-whose-murder-became-symbol-gay-rights-movement-will-be-interred-washington-national-cathedral/?utm_term=.7dd6b2327c2a

Even if you consider his death a "senseless murder," how is it HIS death is more important than all other "senseless murder" victims? All the victims of school shootings or serial killers, or unfortunate individuals like the NYC jogger stabbed to death by a psycho a couple of weeks ago? Why don't THEY deserve places of honor in the (so-called, shamefully) National Cathedral?

It's different for the same reason that AIDS was treated as a special "privileged" disease, more deserving of federal research money than cancer & other diseases that a person gets without asking for them! It's different because Sodomites have been elevated by organized faggotry (the many well-funded groups formed to promote the homo lifestyle), & the fag-saturated media, to a special privileged status that tries to make everything that concerns them of national importance.

[barretcreek]

'The Book of Matt' https://www.npr.org/2013/10/06/22643...nfamous-murder

This book, by a gay author, debunks the 'hate crime' narrative. It was just another drug deal gone bad; the two killers made up the story to gain some benefit from the system. Hey, who says murderers are the smartest guys in the room? I'm not gonna pay to read The Compost so I don't know what's covered in the article, if they reveal that.

But if you want to know how corrupt D.C. is search NAMBLA.

[clintonhater]

I'm not gonna pay to read The Compost so I don't know what's covered in the article, if they reveal that.

Don't have to pay, but they do NOT! In fact, I checked several other reports of this Sodomite's death, & ALL of them portray him as a martyr who died in defense of buggery. There's now a "MS Foundation" to promote buggery, as if the media & entertainment industry & US Episcopal Church wasn't doing enough for that cause!

[togor]

CH you sure seem to have something up your butt when it comes to gays. What's the deal? You tired of getting hit on or something by the old bachelor who runs the town library?

[oscars]

Biggest fag basher in Maryland was Congressman Bob Bauman who made hi rep with anti gay campaigns. All was fine until this

"The Republican representative from Maryland was arrested Oct. 3, 1980, for soliciting sex from a 16-year-old male prostitute. The arrest came in the midst of Bauman's reelection campaign, occurring after the deadline for withdrawal from the contest, and thus handing the election to Democrat Roy Dyson, who hadn't stood a chance before Bauman's arrest."

[dogtag]

With enough queers, transexuals and sodomites you can wreck a society.
The democrat plan - Bring it all down, then we can take over.

[togor]

DT being English and all, it reminded me of Gen. Montgomery. Being publicly against gays and privately one of them is almost cliché.

https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2001/feb/26/books.booksnews

[blackhawknj]

Some months after the Mathew Shepard case there was the murder of 13 year old Jesse Dirkhising by two homosexuals who claimed it was merely "rpough sex that went bad." Brent Bozell commented that "No liberal media outlet has as its villains two gay men." Yes, the homosexuals came out of the AIDS plague smelling like a rose, you'd never know that AIDS is an STD.
Montgomery died in 1976, easy to bash someone who has dead for decades-and cannot sue for libel.
Robert Baumann-sort of a political Bill Cosby, no ?

[togor]

Not bashing Monty for the fact that he felt a deep affinity to be in the exclusive company of men. For an inflated reputation as a general, maybe. And perhaps for the hypocrisy. If people want we can have a conversation about whether individual liberty in our society should be increasing or decreasing. The broader point to me is that the idea that gays should spend their whole life in the closet because others think such an attraction is icky directly confronts ideas of individual freedom and liberty that have been part of this country since the beginning. There's even a tax angle here if someone bites.

[clintonhater]

CH you sure seem to have something up your butt when it comes to gays. What's the deal? You tired of getting hit on or something by the old bachelor who runs the town library?

And I was just thinking, ain't it queer that you've appointed yourself Chief Apologist for homo-nation.

[blackhawknj]

The church going side of me feels sorry for homosexuals, they have been dealt a bad hand, wired wrong. The other side of me is disgusted by them.

[Vern Humphrey]

The Catholic position is that we do not condemn homosexuals, but consider homosexual acts to be wrong. It's no sin to have same-sex attraction, but to act on that attraction is wrong -- just like acting on a violent temper, a propensity for binge drinking, taking drugs and so on and so on is not wrong -- but acting out those impulses is.

[clintonhater]

The broader point to me is that the idea that gays should spend their whole life in the closet because others think such an attraction is icky directly confronts ideas of individual freedom and liberty that have been part of this country since the beginning.

So withholding the special privileges they now enjoy under the dogma of PC--such as this National Cathedral disgrace--is the same as making them "spend their whole life in the closet"? Not being allowed the privilege of parading down Main St. is equivalent to making them spend their whole life in the closet? "Individual freedom and liberty" NEVER included acceptance of sexual perversion until very recently in this country's history. And where's MY "individual freedom and liberty" when PUBLIC spaces like roads & parks are handed over to Sodomites?

[togor]

And I was just thinking, ain't it queer that you've appointed yourself Chief Apologist for homo-nation.

Apologist? I'd need to see a link or two to posts of mine demonstrating that. To me it's not about the gays, except that you are singular here in your dislike of them and that piques curiosity. More broadly however you take a stand against individual liberty. That I think makes you fair game, because I believe if all of the gays disappeared back into the closet then you would just move on to the next group on your "bad" list. Again, you'd be happier in Russia where such lists are a government staple.

[Vern Humphrey]

Let me point out, we are dealing with National Socialists here. The underlying foundation of Fascism is the Corporate State -- a system where there are no INDIVIDUAL rights, only corporate rights. The government deals with people in groups ("corporations"). Unions have rights, gays have rights, women have rights, but INDIVIDUALS have no rights.