Tijuana protesters chant 'Out!' at migrants camped in city

[JB White]

Let them do their raking in Mexico.

You know, this may be a good thing. If we refuse to let them into the US, they become Mexico's problem, and Mexico may learn not to let these people into their country.

Not a bad idea. Let's see how Mexico's welfare system works for a change.

[clintonhater]

If we refuse to let them into the US

The insurmountable problem is that the fed gov't CAN'T "refuse to let them" if they mouth the correct code words (carefully coached by the US traitors who've set up shop in Mexico) that automatically confers "asylum applicant" status on them under current fed law. The latest crooked trick that these US traitors have come up with is to tell the invaders not only to claim they're persecuted for political reasons, but because they're homos or trans-freaks!

[Vern Humphrey]

The insurmountable problem is that the fed gov't CAN'T "refuse to let them" if they mouth the correct code words (carefully coached by the US traitors who've set up shop in Mexico) that automatically confers "asylum applicant" status on them under current fed law. The latest crooked trick that these US traitors have come up with is to tell the invaders not only to claim they're persecuted for political reasons, but because they're homos or trans-freaks!

So we let in one a day -- checking all those claims is time-consuming, you know. In the meantime, Mexico has to take care of the other twenty quajillion "immigrants."

[Allen]

That means letting them in and staying so they can steal jobs from prisoners.

Welfare people. Not illegals. Putting welfare citizens here to work.

- - - Updated - - -

So we let in one a day -- checking all those claims is time-consuming, you know. In the meantime, Mexico has to take care of the other twenty quajillion "immigrants."

Hey, they're the one's who let them in. They could have stopped them. Their immigrations laws are much stricter than ours but why go to the trouble if you know they are just going to pass through and become someone else's burden?

[Vern Humphrey]

Welfare people. Not illegals. Putting welfare citizens here to work.

- - - Updated - - -



Hey, they're the one's who let them in. They could have stopped them. Their immigrations laws are much stricter than ours but why go to the trouble if you know they are just going to pass through and become someone else's burden?

So it is time to disabuse them of that burden. Under international law the "immigrants" are entitled to refugee status ONLY in the FIRST country they enter -- they can't be passed on to another country.

[Allen]

So it is time to disabuse them of that burden. Under international law the "immigrants" are entitled to refugee status ONLY in the FIRST country they enter -- they can't be passed on to another country.

Correct you are but they are here. We are not obligated to offer the first one amnesty. Some of them have been offered work by Mexico. Of course they turned it down. If all of them decide just to stay in Mexico they will eventually try to enter here on a smaller scale in more remote areas. There's no telling how many are coming in from the North border, Southern Florida, the desert areas of Texas and isolated water ways all over.

[dryheat]

Oh yeah, Mexico is real good at keeping people in their country from stealing into our country. Ahhh, what, 12 or 15 million illegals here now?

[Allen]

Oh yeah, Mexico is real good at keeping people in their country from stealing into our country. Ahhh, what, 12 or 15 million illegals here now?

That can probably by multiplied by at least 10.