A stupid liberal comparison ...

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • dogtag
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 14985
    #1

    A stupid liberal comparison ...

    Comparing the First Lady's e-mails to Hillary's.
    The First Lady did not e-mail State secrets.
    Hilary Did.

    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-messages.html
    Tags: None
    • togor
      Banned
      • Nov 2009
      • 17610
      #2
      But DT, what do you really know for a fact in either case? The point being, if such a to-do was made about Hillary's emails and none at all is made about Ivanka's, then the line gets thinner and harder to split. Might be time to dial up that Pete Townshend (he's English you know) classic: Won't Get Fooled Again, from the 1971 album "Who's Next". IMO, their best. It still sounds great today.

        Comment

        • Roadkingtrax
          Senior Member
          • Feb 2010
          • 7835
          #3
          Lock her up!
          "The first gun that was fired at Fort Sumter sounded the death-knell of slavery. They who fired it were the greatest practical abolitionists this nation has produced." ~BG D. Ullman

            Comment

            • Allen
              Moderator
              • Sep 2009
              • 10583
              #4
              Yep. Apples and oranges and the media is eating it up. Hillary, as EVERYONE knows, sent out a lot of sensitive classified info over an unsecured personal account over a long period of time then denied it. Ivanka apparently sent government related info to other government employees using an unsecured personal account but in any case the info would not have been classified as she is not exposed to it. After hillary's stunts she knows not to do the same and has already stated that she didn't know she was doing anything wrong so the info couldn't have been too severe. I'm sure she will get talked to over this and it will end except for all the news media excitement over it.

              Expect to hear about this 24/7 from all the red faced squawking liberals who can't seem to report actual newsworthy reports.

                Comment

                • togor
                  Banned
                  • Nov 2009
                  • 17610
                  #5
                  Sensitive classified info about what? Be specific. Like saying "so-and-so stole millions". Stole millions from who? What I've read is that Hillary's servers had lots of stupid bullsh*t on them, and a handful of exchanges that were a bit more sensitive. But then hey it's only diplomacy, and we know how little Trump thinks of that. The whole "lock her up" argument unravels as soon as someone starts tugging at it with even middling questions. If it were Condi Rice, not nearly the stink. But it's Hillary.

                    Comment

                    • Sako
                      Senior Member
                      • Sep 2009
                      • 654
                      #6
                      Originally posted by togor
                      Sensitive classified info about what? Be specific. Like saying "so-and-so stole millions". Stole millions from who? What I've read is that Hillary's servers had lots of stupid bullsh*t on them, and a handful of exchanges that were a bit more sensitive. But then hey it's only diplomacy, and we know how little Trump thinks of that. The whole "lock her up" argument unravels as soon as someone starts tugging at it with even middling questions. If it were Condi Rice, not nearly the stink. But it's Hillary.
                      Oh mommy LOOK every one is out of step but hillary.

                        Comment

                        Previous template Next
                        Working...