Heard the idea on Rush.
This article covers keeping asylum seekers in Mexico while
their cases are considered in the US. But this leaves decisions
at the mercy of liberal Judges who'll overturn anything Trump
attempts.
But if the asylum considerations were done in Mexico, which I'm
sure could be arranged whereby something permanent is set up,
this I assume it would put much if not all decisions out of the
hands of those same Judges. This is the set up in many other
countries, Europe and others where busybody judges have no say.
So, why not in Mexico ? It is another country after all. This would
keep the seekers out of here while their pleas are considered thus
ensuring they don't disappear never to be seen again which is the
the present situation the liberals want to keep going. Considering
750.000 have already disappeared, it might at least stem the flood.
https://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...t-in-mexico-as
This article covers keeping asylum seekers in Mexico while
their cases are considered in the US. But this leaves decisions
at the mercy of liberal Judges who'll overturn anything Trump
attempts.
But if the asylum considerations were done in Mexico, which I'm
sure could be arranged whereby something permanent is set up,
this I assume it would put much if not all decisions out of the
hands of those same Judges. This is the set up in many other
countries, Europe and others where busybody judges have no say.
So, why not in Mexico ? It is another country after all. This would
keep the seekers out of here while their pleas are considered thus
ensuring they don't disappear never to be seen again which is the
the present situation the liberals want to keep going. Considering
750.000 have already disappeared, it might at least stem the flood.
https://thehill.com/homenews/adminis...t-in-mexico-as

Comment