How I KNEW the Repub won in ol' Miss.
Collapse
X
-
"The first gun that was fired at Fort Sumter sounded the death-knell of slavery. They who fired it were the greatest practical abolitionists this nation has produced." ~BG D. Ullman -
The usual method of hanging until sometime in the 19th C. when the "trap-door" scaffold was invented, was either to force the victim to climb a ladder followed by the hangman, who'd then "swing off" the victim, as was done to the Salem "witches," or hoist them up from the ground with a rope.
MILLIONS of whites all over the world were put to death this way before the first black was ever lynched in this country. Nevertheless, the same kind of noose put around MILLIONS of white necks is now a symbol of black oppression, according to our corrupt media.Comment
-
CH, have Mississippi whites, in the past, use the noose as a means of instilling terror in the black population? Yes they have. When the nooses come out on the eve of a racially charged election, with one of the candidates being black, is it meant as a reminder of that capacity for terror? Yes it is. Your argument is wholly transparent. I doubt you're even kidding yourself. You're certainly not fooling anyone else.Comment
-
What's transparent is your hatred of white southern culture. The ONLY nooses that came out were the ones displayed by race-baiting supporters of the Dem. A "public hanging," the term used facetiously by the Repub, is by definition a legal execution, not a lynching. The number of lynchings in Miss or elsewhere is dwarfed by the number of legal executions by hanging, most of them whites, & yet NOW, the media & the Dems (the difference between the two...?) have conspired to invent the outrageous lie that the noose was only used to "instill terror in the black population."CH, have Mississippi whites, in the past, use the noose as a means of instilling terror in the black population? Yes they have. When the nooses come out on the eve of a racially charged election, with one of the candidates being black, is it meant as a reminder of that capacity for terror? Yes it is. Your argument is wholly transparent. I doubt you're even kidding yourself. You're certainly not fooling anyone else.Comment
-
Loaded words, if ever. If a nostalgia for a social hierarchy based on race is part of your definition of southern white culture, then yeah, I'm against that. So you tell me what the difference is in your mind between "southern culture" and "southern WHITE culture" and then maybe we can play ball. Somehow I have a feelilng there is more to this in your mind than bluegrass music.Last edited by togor; 11-29-2018, 05:25.Comment
-
The difference is that "southern WHITE culture" is the culture of the MAJORITY, otherwise known as democracy. Democracy worthy of the name is what's now called Populism, but what liberals mean by democracy is rule by the elites who "know best" what's good for the hoi-polloi. Thus in "democratic" Europe, the LAST thing the ruling elites would allow is letting citizens themselves vote directly on whether they wished to have the character of their country permanently changed by rolling out the red carpet for the scum of the Turd World.Comment
-
Most people didn't vote for Trump, so not sure what you're getting at, unless it's that majorities are good when you agree with them, and are oppressive tyranny when you don't. Most people feel that that way, to differing levels of passion, and it's hardly news. All of your arguments invariably boil down to: you want what you like to be the law of the land, and the stuff you don't like to be banished.Comment
-
You have to understand, the man you are talking to despises the South. Who you are as a person does not matter to him -- you're from the South and that's all he cares about. In other circles, that would be called "bigotry."Comment
-
Comment
-
-
-
No, not you personally, merely your culture, history, traditions. (However, that's assuming you don't own a stars & bars flag, which proves to him you're a Klansman; in that case, it would be personal.)Comment

Comment