Obamacare Just Declared Unconstitutional By A Federal Judge!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • sid
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 3198

    #1

    Obamacare Just Declared Unconstitutional By A Federal Judge!

    It's about time.

    The Affordable Care Act, also known as ObamaCare, was struck down by a Texas judge on Friday, a move that could suddenly disrupt the health insurance status of millions of Americans.
  • dogtag
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 14985

    #2
    Sounds good - but it ain't over until the fat lady sings.

    Comment

    • JohnMOhio
      Senior Member
      • Aug 2009
      • 1545

      #3
      You have that right dogtag. There is bound to be more.
      Peace is that brief glorious moment in history when everybody stands around reloading.
      Author unkown.

      Comment

      • togor
        Banned
        • Nov 2009
        • 17610

        #4
        Great news! Pre-existing condition coverage will be eliminated soon! How are people here going to celebrate? BTW, unless SCOTUS disagrees, a judge just handed a potent political weapon to the people that many here hate. Next election is just two years away.

        Comment

        • S.A. Boggs
          Senior Member
          • Aug 2009
          • 8568

          #5
          Originally posted by togor
          Great news! Pre-existing condition coverage will be eliminated soon! How are people here going to celebrate? BTW, unless SCOTUS disagrees, a judge just handed a potent political weapon to the people that many here hate. Next election is just two years away.
          Politely disagree, Obamacare was a noxious start to an actual need of American healthcare. Problem is how does one separate those in true need to those looking for a free ride at society's expense? As a cancer survivor healthcare is important to me, how does one pay for it? Some people want "free" healthcare with a "free" ride and that is not reasonable. For our family the Wal-Mart plan has been affordable and exceptionable, IMHO if this plan was adopted it could go a long way to solving the healthcare issues of America.
          Sam

          Comment

          • JB White
            Senior Member
            • Aug 2009
            • 13371

            #6
            Originally posted by togor
            Great news! Pre-existing condition coverage will be eliminated soon! How are people here going to celebrate? BTW, unless SCOTUS disagrees, a judge just handed a potent political weapon to the people that many here hate. Next election is just two years away.
            Hold on...the Repubs (including Trump) are calling for a replacement plan which allows for pre-existing conditions. Hopefully they will reopen the initial bipartisan plan which the dems shot down because some Republicans co-sponsored the proposal. It worked like a corporate or union plan which called for a small percentage to be deducted from the gross wage amount. Same as most of us have been doing.
            People on welfare may have to take a 2% or 3% hit off the top for medical care instead of crab legs and crack.
            2016 Chicago Cubs. MLB Champions!


            **Never quite as old as the other old farts**

            Comment

            • togor
              Banned
              • Nov 2009
              • 17610

              #7
              So JB, the plan is to get judges to throw out the law, putting the insurance industry into a state of heightened uncertainty, and then Trump and the GOP will ride to the rescue with a plan that picks up just enough Dem votes to get through, and it will somehow keep the good parts of Obamacare and get rid of the bad, whatever those are? That's a total pipe dream in my opinion.

              Comment

              • Roadkingtrax
                Senior Member
                • Feb 2010
                • 7835

                #8
                Originally posted by togor
                So JB, the plan is to get judges to throw out the law, putting the insurance industry into a state of heightened uncertainty, and then Trump and the GOP will ride to the rescue with a plan that picks up just enough Dem votes to get through, and it will somehow keep the good parts of Obamacare and get rid of the bad, whatever those are? That's a total pipe dream in my opinion.
                Let's have a round of applause for GOP support of activist judges, shall we?

                Could this be a gateway to Medicare for all, as it should have been?
                "The first gun that was fired at Fort Sumter sounded the death-knell of slavery. They who fired it were the greatest practical abolitionists this nation has produced." ~BG D. Ullman

                Comment

                • togor
                  Banned
                  • Nov 2009
                  • 17610

                  #9
                  Assume as a starting point that all sides in a civil court action believe the Constitution to be on their side. Therefore:

                  Activist Judge: one who rules against me.

                  Constitutional Conservative Judge: one who rules the way I like.

                  Comment

                  • Major Tom
                    Very Senior Member - OFC
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 6181

                    #10
                    Because of O'Bamma Care, several friends of ours don't buy in to that nonsense. Yes, they pay the fee at tax time, BUT, it is much less than what O'Bamma Care would cost them.

                    Comment

                    • oscars
                      Senior Member
                      • Nov 2009
                      • 551

                      #11
                      So what happens if your buds have some sort o catastrophic health situation. Sounds to me that they are playing one big crap shoot. Those wonderful el cheapo policies that Trump is in love with don't cover squat. Of course, they could use the ER's as walk in clinics. Hey, I know, you could set up a Go Fund Me page.

                      Comment

                      • Vern Humphrey
                        Administrator - OFC
                        • Aug 2009
                        • 15875

                        #12
                        Originally posted by oscars
                        So what happens if your buds have some sort o catastrophic health situation. Sounds to me that they are playing one big crap shoot. Those wonderful el cheapo policies that Trump is in love with don't cover squat. Of course, they could use the ER's as walk in clinics. Hey, I know, you could set up a Go Fund Me page.
                        Hey, it's simple. If they have some sort of catastrophic health situation, they SIMPLY BUY INSURANCE THEN -- and it will cover the pre-existing condition!!

                        Comment

                        • JB White
                          Senior Member
                          • Aug 2009
                          • 13371

                          #13
                          Of course, they could use the ER's as walk in clinics. Hey, I know, you could set up a Go Fund Me page.
                          They have been using ER's as clinics for a long time and still set up GFM pages whether ObamaCare is in place or not. So, what does that tell you about ObamaCare? Plenty of people in the health care field think Obamacare as a whole totally sucks.

                          They claimed it was a TAX to reimburse the insurance companies. That is how they sold the boondoggle to the SCOTUS. We pay more out of our pockets so corporations get paid for token coverage while the poor guy THINKS he's getting something for free.
                          2016 Chicago Cubs. MLB Champions!


                          **Never quite as old as the other old farts**

                          Comment

                          • togor
                            Banned
                            • Nov 2009
                            • 17610

                            #14
                            JB your point lacks perspective. It's a bit like saying that it rains in Boston and Miami both therefore there is no difference between the two in weather. Under ACA, the number of uninsured did drop, and the insurance they got wasn't some tissue paper coverage. National single payer is proven to work in other countries and is currently how most at this forum receive their health care. As a hybrid system Obamacare gets bracketed with fire from both sides, but it accomplished what it set out to do--get more people decent coverage. I find it remarkable how some think that basic goal is a terrible thing. And some who think that way claim to be for working people.

                            Comment

                            • Vern Humphrey
                              Administrator - OFC
                              • Aug 2009
                              • 15875

                              #15
                              Originally posted by JB White
                              They have been using ER's as clinics for a long time and still set up GFM pages whether ObamaCare is in place or not. So, what does that tell you about ObamaCare? Plenty of people in the health care field think Obamacare as a whole totally sucks.

                              They claimed it was a TAX to reimburse the insurance companies. That is how they sold the boondoggle to the SCOTUS. We pay more out of our pockets so corporations get paid for token coverage while the poor guy THINKS he's getting something for free.
                              Not quite. It was officially a FINE. Not unreasonably, people opposed to that abomination pointed out that you can't be fined without a trial and conviction. Our lunkheaded Chief Justice, bending over backward to warp the Constitution, said it could be considered a TAX.

                              Article I, Section 2, Clause 3: Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers
                              If it's a tax, it's a direct tax (the people pay it directly) and it is NOT apportioned among the several States

                              Amendment XVI: The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes on incomes, from whatever source derived, without apportionment among the several states, and without regard to any census of enumeration.
                              But it's NOT an income tax, either.

                              It is patently unconstitutional;!

                              Comment

                              Working...