Who watches the watchers?

[S.A. Boggs]

Some in the FBI started their investigation on President Trump the day he was elected, why? Now that evidence has surfaced of a political bias in the "investigation" one wonders if the investigation is politically tainted. Under Obama's administration those on the right were denied rights that were freely given to the socialists, contempt of Congress ignored, MSM openly then and now a political arm of the NSDWP. Why should any American trust anything that the Justice Department does now?
The deck is stacked against anyone who wants to turn America away from the National Socialist path and this is dangerous. One wonders now with the fuse lit with the shutdown how much trust should the President have in those who protect him...I wouldn't!
Sam

[Vern Humphrey]

Some in the FBI started their investigation on President Trump the day he was elected, why? Now that evidence has surfaced of a political bias in the "investigation" one wonders if the investigation is politically tainted. Under Obama's administration those on the right were denied rights that were freely given to the socialists, contempt of Congress ignored, MSM openly then and now a political arm of the NSDWP. Why should any American trust anything that the Justice Department does now?
The deck is stacked against anyone who wants to turn America away from the National Socialist path and this is dangerous. One wonders now with the fuse lit with the shutdown how much trust should the President have in those who protect him...I wouldn't!
Sam

As more and more comes out, I'm beginning to wonder if the FBI shouldn't be shut down permanently.

[togor]

As more and more comes out, I'm beginning to wonder if the FBI shouldn't be shut down permanently.

Of course you are. But take off your partisan cap for a moment (hard for you I know) and ask how you would want the Justice Department to respond if they thought any President was compromised. If their oath is to the Constitution, then their choice of conscience is clear, is it not? If the evidence exonerates said President, then the system works. You think exclusively in partisan terms and assume the same holds true for everyone. Consequently you arrive at incorrect conclusions time and again about people's motives.

[dogtag]

"one wonders if the investigation is politically tainted" ?

This one doesn't wonder. This one knows it was.

[barretcreek]

Lisa Page's testimony to the congressional committee has been leaked. Coverup for the Witch. Let me find the link. Here ya go.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/transcripts-of-lisa-pages-closed-door-testimonies-provide-new-revelations_2763452.html

[Sandpebble]

How many people connected to Trump had affiliation to Russian and Ukranian/Russian agents or organizations?

Well... quite a few it seems .

That being the case the FBI were doing their sworn duty like any veteran that took the oath.... " All enemies foriegn.... or domestic"

trump being innocent or not of collusion .... The FBI were on the ball and doing their job ....

[barretcreek]

How many people connected to Trump had affiliation to Russian and Ukranian/Russian agents or organizations?

Well... quite a few it seems .

That being the case the FBI were doing their sworn duty like any veteran that took the oath.... " All enemies foriegn.... or domestic"

trump being innocent or not of collusion .... The FBI were on the ball and doing their job ....

Yes, I agree they should give Trump a thorough look.

It would be reassuring if they looked at Uranium One, Emailgate, LORAL and a few other things with the same dedication. Instead they have focused with Nelson's Eye.

[Sandpebble]

Perhaps ...

Yes, I agree they should give Trump a thorough look.

It would be reassuring if they looked at Uranium One, Emailgate, LORAL and a few other things with the same dedication. Instead they have focused with Nelson's Eye.

Perhaps what they focused on was what was easiest to prove true.....

[dogtag]

Yes, I agree they should give Trump a thorough look.

It would be reassuring if they looked at Uranium One, Emailgate, LORAL and a few other things with the same dedication. Instead they have focused with Nelson's Eye.

"I see no Crooks - I mean Ships"

[togor]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/trump-has-concealed-details-of-his-face-to-face-encounters-with-putin-from-senior-officials-in-administration/2019/01/12/65f6686c-1434-11e9-b6ad-9cfd62dbb0a8_story.html

An objective observer of the situation (which is to say definitely someone other than Red) would ask why Trump finds it necessary that no other American should have first hand knowledge of what was discussed with Putin. Such a radical departure from standard practice, if reserved exclusively for Putin, raises questions of what the heck is going on there (to put it mildly).