People Collecting SNAP Are Paid But My Son Isn't

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • m1ashooter
    Senior Member
    • May 2011
    • 3220

    #1

    People Collecting SNAP Are Paid But My Son Isn't

    I just researched this and now I'm more pissed off then before. Our members of DHS and others are working and not being paid. I no longer want to hear that they should have saved and will get their back pay etc. That's now a moot point. If you are on SNAP or welfare as we used to call it, your tax payer handouts were deposited for January and February. After that they might not be paid if the shutdown continues. So has this been done to sooth the savage beast and keep them calm so they will not take to the streets and rob and loot? Probably so. What would happen if all the members of the Border Patrol, ICE, USCG and the air traffic controllers just didn't show up to work? Chaos would occur and people would die. Maybe that is exactly what needs to happen.
    To Error Is Human To Forgive Is Not SAC Policy
  • S.A. Boggs
    Senior Member
    • Aug 2009
    • 8568

    #2
    Originally posted by m1ashooter
    I just researched this and now I'm more pissed off then before. Our members of DHS and others are working and not being paid. I no longer want to hear that they should have saved and will get their back pay etc. That's now a moot point. If you are on SNAP or welfare as we used to call it, your tax payer handouts were deposited for January and February. After that they might not be paid if the shutdown continues. So has this been done to sooth the savage beast and keep them calm so they will not take to the streets and rob and loot? Probably so. What would happen if all the members of the Border Patrol, ICE, USCG and the air traffic controllers just didn't show up to work? Chaos would occur and people would die. Maybe that is exactly what needs to happen.
    Does one expect democratic entitles to go with out their substance? Does one expect them to suddenly go out and get a job at "gasp" fast food?
    Sam

    Comment

    • clintonhater
      Senior Member
      • Nov 2015
      • 5220

      #3
      Originally posted by S.A. Boggs
      Does one expect democratic entitles to go with out their substance? Does one expect them to suddenly go out and get a job at "gasp" fast food?
      So your recommendation is that all those employed by ICE, BP, TSA, etc., go looking for jobs in fast food? Very sensible.

      Trump is now stirring up more hatred not only for himself, but all Repubs, than anything else he's ever done. For ex., grocery stores will feel the loss as much as the SNAP recipients.

      And all for what? To "break the will" of the most radical left-wing House in US history, cause them to cave in on the Wall? It's insane to think this will work, when every day that it continues, more middle of the road voters turn Democratic. The longer it lasts, the more the Dems like it.

      Comment

      • togor
        Banned
        • Nov 2009
        • 17610

        #4
        CH may be right. There certainly seems to be an element of "ball-breaking" (as in who will break whose) that has come to the forefront here.

        Comment

        • Vern Humphrey
          Administrator - OFC
          • Aug 2009
          • 15875

          #5
          Originally posted by clintonhater
          So your recommendation is that all those employed by ICE, BP, TSA, etc., go looking for jobs in fast food? Very sensible.
          Be fair. That's not what he said. His reference was to those on welfare getting jobs.

          Comment

          • clintonhater
            Senior Member
            • Nov 2015
            • 5220

            #6
            Originally posted by Vern Humphrey
            Be fair. That's not what he said. His reference was to those on welfare getting jobs.
            He was responding to a post pertaining to workers for ICE, BP, etc., not getting paid, not people on welfare.

            Comment

            • Allen
              Moderator
              • Sep 2009
              • 10583

              #7
              How is any of this Trumps fault? Some of you guys sound like a bunch of liberals. Trump made his demands CLEAR about the wall before the budget ever expired. The dimwits don't want to negotiate due to losing voters--a wall is the absolute last thing they want even if it aids to the security of our nation. As I always said Mexico would end up paying for the wall through NAFTA adjustments. Now, that is exactly what Trump is saying about the "new deal". He should present this (if true) in his speeches.

              While I don't believe some of these jobs should be funded by a budget that is negotiated twice or more each year, they are and we can't change that. Jobs that support any type of security should be funded with that of the military I feel.

              Constantly negotiated budgets should be that of programs that do NOT give back or support the nation such as welfare and foreign aid. For some reason though this seems to be sacred ground and never addressed. This "excess" money is nothing but a gift and should be subject to discussion, not the budget that supports America and it's people.

              Comment

              • dogtag
                Senior Member
                • Sep 2009
                • 14985

                #8
                Trump's right, but he's going to lose the shutdown fight because
                the American people are too dumb to see the big picture. All
                they hear is the sobbing and all they see is the media hype.

                Comment

                • clintonhater
                  Senior Member
                  • Nov 2015
                  • 5220

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Allen
                  How is any of this Trumps fault?
                  Because he waited to apply any significant political pressure until it was too late, until it was in fact IMPOSSIBLE. On the day the Dems took control of the House with new members far more radical than the old ones, it became IMPOSSIBLE. Why can't you & others understand that this is a WINNING issue for the Dems precisely because Trump boasted about his willingness to cause a shutdown.

                  Who do you think all the people adversely effected are blaming for their troubles, the Dems who won't build a wall, or Trump for causing this mess? Does Pelosi's planned trip to Afghan sound like the Dems are worried? Every day that it drags on earns more support for THEM. What's the point of blaming it on the "stupidity" of US voters (which is certainly true, but irrelevant)? Isn't that stupidity a political factor that should have been carefully considered before causing this mess?

                  Comment

                  • S.A. Boggs
                    Senior Member
                    • Aug 2009
                    • 8568

                    #10
                    Originally posted by Vern Humphrey
                    Be fair. That's not what he said. His reference was to those on welfare getting jobs.
                    Thanks Vern, that is the jest of my statement. It is unfortunate that other's take something for what it is not and then run with it. I wonder who else here is an employee of Buzzfeed?
                    Sam

                    Comment

                    • Allen
                      Moderator
                      • Sep 2009
                      • 10583

                      #11
                      Originally posted by clintonhater
                      Because he waited to apply any significant political pressure until it was too late, until it was in fact IMPOSSIBLE. On the day the Dems took control of the House with new members far more radical than the old ones, it became IMPOSSIBLE. Why can't you & others understand that this is a WINNING issue for the Dems precisely because Trump boasted about his willingness to cause a shutdown.

                      Who do you think all the people adversely effected are blaming for their troubles, the Dems who won't build a wall, or Trump for causing this mess? Does Pelosi's planned trip to Afghan sound like the Dems are worried? Every day that it drags on earns more support for THEM. What's the point of blaming it on the "stupidity" of US voters (which is certainly true, but irrelevant)? Isn't that stupidity a political factor that should have been carefully considered before causing this mess?
                      Some people watch way too much liberal news on TV.

                      Comment

                      • clintonhater
                        Senior Member
                        • Nov 2015
                        • 5220

                        #12
                        Originally posted by Allen
                        Some people watch way too much liberal news on TV.
                        Do you mean that I've been misinformed about the radical Dems now controlling the House? Who'd resign before they ever approve money for a Wall? Who are so worried about being blamed for this shutdown that they won't even negotiate?

                        Comment

                        • RED
                          Very Senior Member - OFC
                          • Aug 2009
                          • 11689

                          #13
                          Originally posted by clintonhater
                          Because he waited to apply any significant political pressure until it was too late, until it was in fact IMPOSSIBLE. On the day the Dems took control of the House with new members far more radical than the old ones, it became IMPOSSIBLE. Why can't you & others understand that this is a WINNING issue for the Dems precisely because Trump boasted about his willingness to cause a shutdown.

                          Who do you think all the people adversely effected are blaming for their troubles, the Dems who won't build a wall, or Trump for causing this mess? Does Pelosi's planned trip to Afghan sound like the Dems are worried? Every day that it drags on earns more support for THEM. What's the point of blaming it on the "stupidity" of US voters (which is certainly true, but irrelevant)? Isn't that stupidity a political factor that should have been carefully considered before causing this mess?
                          Not so fast... the bill to build the wall would have never made it to Trump's desk. The Republicans can be said to have had a majority in both houses but Trump didn't. Corker, McCain, Flake, Amash, Romney, Snow, Sasse, Comstock, Sanford, Heller, and yes Graham, etc. would have made sure that the wall was a non starter.

                          If you want to play the blame game, look at the reality of the situation and Trump has never had a majority in either house prior to the November election. In order to get anything done he has to get help from at least a few Democrats. Take Barr for example. Trump knew that a real Conservative would never be confirmed so he looked for a guy that would be hard for the Dems to reject. Looking forward, the replacement for Ginsberg, my bet would be that he picks another "moderate," for the job.
                          Last edited by RED; 01-19-2019, 01:51.

                          Comment

                          • Sandpebble
                            Senior Member
                            • Mar 2017
                            • 2196

                            #14
                            Originally posted by RED
                            Not so fast... the bill to build the wall would have never made it to Trump's desk. The Republicans can be said to have had a majority in both houses but Trump didn't. Corker, McCain, Flake, Amash, Romney, Snow, Sasse, Comstock, Sanford, Heller, and yes Graham, etc. would have made sure that the wall was a non starter.

                            If you want to play the blame game, look at the reality of the situation and Trump has never had a majority in either house prior to the November election. In order to get anything done he has to get help from at least a few Democrats. Take Barr for example. Trump knew that a real Conservative would never be confirmed so he looked for a guy that would be hard for the Dems to reject. Looking forward, the replacement for Ginsberg, my bet would be that he picks another "moderate," for the job.
                            Well red ... perhaps he shouldn't have made it a point to embarrass, ridicule , and insult so many people... the FBI, CIA , Military and Law enforcement.... Blacks , Hispanics, every on of our allies {while defending the likes of Russia} and every politian on earth ours or otherwise. If he hadn't.... maybe more would have been willing to work with him....

                            Diplomacy works better than a failed claim to be the "greatest negotiator" .... that should be obvious to us all by now......

                            Comment

                            • Vern Humphrey
                              Administrator - OFC
                              • Aug 2009
                              • 15875

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Maus45
                              Go cry somewhere else loser. If he don't like it he can always work at Taco Bell.
                              There's no need for that kind of talk. You can make your point without being gratuitously offensive.

                              Comment

                              Working...