-
"The first gun that was fired at Fort Sumter sounded the death-knell of slavery. They who fired it were the greatest practical abolitionists this nation has produced." ~BG D. Ullman -
This is the new face of the NSDWP as my parent's Democratic Party is dead.36643301_948726448663629_1301498867350503424_n.jpg
The socialists are touting exactly what Hitler did and people are listening to what is being proposed by the Bernie types. Added to the new push for killing babies as the child is being born, the "free" healthcare and "free" college education. Fools like "ours" are touting the Hitlerian party line in the belief that this will trickle down to their family. Maybe "they" can be the block wardens reporting to the American Gestapo and elevate their social rank. Look how the party abandoned the "Dreamers" when a path was available to keep the illegal and the drugs flowing into the Republic.
SamComment
-
Under Hitler's socialism people were allowed to vote but they were forced to vote for Hitler. Since Reagan we have been forced to vote either dimocrat or RINO where either way the dimocrats had control. Now Trump comes along and everybody who is part of this corruption is against him for their own personal gain. America is losing to communism w/o going to war. Small wonder the dimocrats (only) want to take our guns so badly and change the meaning of the 2nd amendment that provides for our protection against them.Last edited by Allen; 02-07-2019, 10:45.Comment
-
National Democratic Socialist Party of America wants to eliminate the Electoral College....here's why:
Last week the newly convened, Democrat-controlled House of Representatives introduced a bill to eliminate the Electoral College. It seems that since they couldn't win the last Presidential election under the rules that have existed for almost 250 years, they want to change the rules. Below is an excellent explanation on why this is a very bad idea.
In their infinite wisdom, the United States' Founders created the Electoral College to ensure the STATES were fairly represented. Why should one or two densely populated areas speak for the whole of the nation? The following list of statistics has been making the rounds on
the Internet. It should finally put an end to the argument as to why the Electoral College makes sense. Do share this. It needs to be widely known and understood.
There are 3,141 counties in the United States. Trump won 3,084 of them. Clinton won 57.
There are 62 counties in New York State.
Trump won 46 of them.
Clinton won 16.
Clinton won the popular vote by approx. 1.5 million votes.
In the 5 counties that encompass NYC, (Bronx, Brooklyn, Manhattan, Richmond, and Queens), Clinton received well over 2 million more votes than Trump. (Clinton only won 4 of these counties; Trump won Richmond.) Therefore these 5 counties alone, more than accounted for Clinton
winning the popular vote of the entire country.
These 5 counties comprise 319 square miles. The United States is comprised of 3,797,000 square miles.
When you have a country that encompasses almost 4 million square miles of territory, it would be ludicrous to even suggest that the vote of those who inhabit a mere 319 square miles should dictate the outcome of a national election. Large, densely populated Democrat cities (NYC, Chicago, LA, etc.) DO NOT and SHOULD NOT speak for the rest of our country!
And...it's been verified and documented that those aforementioned 319 square miles are where the majority of our nation's problems foment.
Well worth the 39 seconds to read?Comment
-
-
-
Tweet
Comment