Economic security for Americans not willing to work!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • JOHN COOK
    Senior Member
    • Sep 2009
    • 711

    #16
    It's called IGNORE. A lot of posters in here keep saying "don't feed the trolls" but the same advisers keep answering the trolls. Take your own advice. I just placed two more on IGNORE..

    john in SC
    “Then said he unto them, But now, he that hath a purse, let him take it, and likewise his scrip: and he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.” (Luke 22:36)

    Comment

    • Vern Humphrey
      Administrator - OFC
      • Aug 2009
      • 15875

      #17
      Answer me this -- according to O-C, we have to accommodate those who don't WANT to work, and support them. Is there any accommodation for those who DO work, and DON'T want to support lazy lay-abouts?

      Comment

      • Allen
        Moderator
        • Sep 2009
        • 10583

        #18
        Originally posted by Vern Humphrey
        Answer me this -- according to O-C, we have to accommodate those who don't WANT to work, and support them. Is there any accommodation for those who DO work, and DON'T want to support lazy lay-abouts?
        Good point.

        NO !!!

        We are the "sugar daddies" for the lazy irresponsible's.

        Comment

        • Vern Humphrey
          Administrator - OFC
          • Aug 2009
          • 15875

          #19
          Originally posted by Allen
          Good point.

          NO !!!

          We are the "sugar daddies" for the lazy irresponsible's.
          And they don't even come around and cut the grass for us.!

          Comment

          • S.A. Boggs
            Senior Member
            • Aug 2009
            • 8568

            #20
            Originally posted by JOHN COOK
            It's called IGNORE. A lot of posters in here keep saying "don't feed the trolls" but the same advisers keep answering the trolls. Take your own advice. I just placed two more on IGNORE..

            john in SC
            I went ahead and put them on the ignore list to avoid their childish prattle. It is like Allen said, one person three almost exact replies. One person sitting at a desk with three lab tops answering for each other person. Wonder how much and who is paying them, I am retired and I don't spend that much time on any forum[s]. If I have time and when taking a break from my home construction, I see they are still "parked" on the forum.
            Sam

            Comment

            • blackhawknj
              Senior Member
              • Aug 2011
              • 3754

              #21
              We've been doing that for decades-it's called AFDC.

              Comment

              • Allen
                Moderator
                • Sep 2009
                • 10583

                #22
                Originally posted by blackhawknj
                We've been doing that for decades-it's called AFDC.
                Better known as welfare.

                Comment

                • togor
                  Banned
                  • Nov 2009
                  • 17610

                  #23
                  Who has a problem making sure kids have enough to eat? Better not be any of the anti-choice people.

                  Comment

                  • blackhawknj
                    Senior Member
                    • Aug 2011
                    • 3754

                    #24
                    What happened to the idea that if you don't want kids, don't do the things that produce them. Isn't it time for women to be told to "keep their pants on" ?
                    And we have hungry children because welfare mothers spend their kids food money on drink and drugs.
                    Last edited by blackhawknj; 02-10-2019, 05:00.

                    Comment

                    • togor
                      Banned
                      • Nov 2009
                      • 17610

                      #25
                      Originally posted by blackhawknj
                      What happened to the idea that if you don't want kids, don't do the things that produce them. Isn't it time for women to be told to "keep their pants on" ?
                      And we have hungry children because welfare mothers spend their kids food money on drink and drugs.
                      Kids don't ask to be born, and it's not their fault if they have lousy parents who act irresponsibly. The one certainty is that they won't be kids forever, and getting enough food as children will make a difference as to what kind of adult they are.
                      Last edited by togor; 02-10-2019, 05:35.

                      Comment

                      • blackhawknj
                        Senior Member
                        • Aug 2011
                        • 3754

                        #26
                        Jeff Bell, the 1978 GOP Senate candidate here in NJ said of the welfare system:
                        "We're subsidizing promiscuity and irresponsibility.
                        And a retired NJ judge told a welfare queen who before him-as a plaintiff-that she was using her children as "meal tickets."
                        And when these kids grow up in a milieu where nobody works and there's always a roof over their heads, clothes on their backs and food on the table....
                        Last edited by blackhawknj; 02-10-2019, 07:30.

                        Comment

                        • rayg
                          Senior Member
                          • Aug 2009
                          • 7444

                          #27
                          Originally posted by S.A. Boggs
                          I went ahead and put them on the ignore list to avoid their childish prattle. It is like Allen said, one person three almost exact replies. One person sitting at a desk with three lab tops answering for each other person. Wonder how much and who is paying them, I am retired and I don't spend that much time on any forum[s]. If I have time and when taking a break from my home construction, I see they are still "parked" on the forum.
                          Sam
                          They/he is just a liberal getting his jollies off disrupting a conservative slanting board or dare I say, maybe a slight bit of mental liberal instability involved. Once in a while they/he will post something half way conservative or normal for this site in an attempt to throw you off. But anyone who has been on this forum for long enough is not fooled and know who they/he is. Too bad as they/he are just running a decent platform for discussing interesting issues then again that is probably the intent. Ray
                          Last edited by rayg; 02-11-2019, 03:26.

                          Comment

                          • S.A. Boggs
                            Senior Member
                            • Aug 2009
                            • 8568

                            #28
                            Originally posted by rayg
                            They/he is just a liberal getting his jollies off disrupting a conservative slanting board or dare I say, maybe a slight bit of mental instability involved. Once in a while they/he will post something half way conservative or normal for this site in an attempt to throw you off. But anyone who has been on this forum for long enough is not fooled and know who they/he is. Too bad as they/he are just running a decent platform for discussing interesting issues then again that is probably the intent. Ray
                            Apparently "they" are just one created to entertain one's self. I put "them" on my Do Not Disturb list to make the boards enjoyable again.
                            Sam

                            Comment

                            • togor
                              Banned
                              • Nov 2009
                              • 17610

                              #29
                              Originally posted by blackhawknj
                              Jeff Bell, the 1978 GOP Senate candidate here in NJ said of the welfare system:
                              "We're subsidizing promiscuity and irresponsibility.
                              And a retired NJ judge told a welfare queen who before him-as a plaintiff-that she was using her children as "meal tickets."
                              And when these kids grow up in a milieu where nobody works and there's always a roof over their heads, clothes on their backs and food on the table....
                              No argument here that accidental/indifferent/indiscriminate parenting is a source of great sorrow, when one looks at the children. But the fact remains, they are born, they are with us, and they won't be children forever. A decision has to be made. I would think birth control would be a better option for us all to live with instead of letting the little buggers starve so as to set an example for the others. But as long as no license is needed to procreate, and as long as it takes about 9 months from the act to the baby, and as long as people are poor, there are going to be babies born to people who cannot afford them.

                              Comment

                              • dryheat
                                Senior Member
                                • Sep 2009
                                • 10587

                                #30
                                The solution is; let hundreds of thousands more people who have no discipline into the country.
                                If I should die before I wake...great,a little more sleep.

                                Comment

                                Working...